What Verdica's 796 score means for Michael A. Akiva
Michael A. Akiva's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in Verdica's "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with above-average compliance standing and professional credentials. This score reflects an overall track record that meets or exceeds regulatory expectations in Colorado, with no significant red flags in the underlying disciplinary or licensing data.
A score in the strong range suggests that a provider has maintained active bar standing, avoided serious regulatory violations, and built a practice profile consistent with legitimate legal work. For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, a 796 score indicates it is generally safe to proceed with engagement, though it is not the highest possible rating (the excellent band starts at 800). The gap between 796 and the maximum of 850 reflects specific areas where the profile could be stronger—in this case, primarily practice profile metrics.
No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for Akiva, so Verdica's score is based entirely on objective regulatory data from Colorado's state bar. This means the rating reflects compliance history alone, not client satisfaction or case outcomes. A reader should view this as a foundation-level clearance, not a comprehensive endorsement.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 / 850
This sub-score measures whether a provider holds an active, unrestricted license to practice law in Colorado. A score of 790 indicates the provider is in good standing with the state bar. In the legal industry, bar standing is the baseline compliance requirement; providers without active licenses cannot legally practice. Akiva's score in this dimension is strong, meaning there are no license suspensions, restrictions, or disciplinary holds affecting his ability to practice.
Disciplinary History: 850 / 850
This is a perfect score, meaning there are no public disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions recorded against Akiva in Colorado's state bar disciplinary database. In the legal industry, disciplinary history is one of the most direct measures of regulatory compliance. The absence of public discipline—whether for ethics violations, malpractice findings, failure to pay bar dues, or misconduct—carries significant weight. A perfect score here is genuinely favorable and suggests adherence to professional conduct standards.
Practice Profile: 700 / 850
This sub-score evaluates the breadth and documentation of Akiva's practice history, including practice areas, experience level, and any specialized credentials or certifications. A score of 700 falls in the acceptable-to-strong range but is the lowest of the three sub-scores. In the legal industry, practice profile scoring typically reflects whether a provider has documented experience in their claimed practice areas, continuing education compliance, and professional standing credentials. A 700 in this dimension suggests the profile is solid but could include more robust documentation of experience, specializations, or credentials.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
Colorado's state bar (the Colorado Supreme Court Attorney Regulation Counsel) maintains disciplinary records that track violations including ethics breaches, dishonesty, neglect of client matters, improper fee practices, and unauthorized practice of law. Verdica's bar standing metric reflects active licensing status and any conditions imposed by the bar. The disciplinary history metric aggregates all public complaints, investigations, and sanctions issued by the state bar.
Practice history data comes from bar registration records, which document practice areas, admission dates, and professional qualifications. Regulators use these records to ensure providers are licensed to practice in their stated specialties and maintain continuing legal education requirements. Scores move down when there are complaints, settlements, license restrictions, or gaps in professional documentation.
Bottom line
Akiva's 796 score indicates a provider with clean disciplinary standing and active bar credentials in Colorado—a solid choice from a compliance perspective. Anyone considering engagement should independently verify his specific experience in their legal area of need and request references, since the regulatory score does not measure client outcomes or service quality.