What Verdica's 796 score means for Michael A. Akiva
Michael A. Akiva's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record. This score reflects compliance data pulled from Florida's state bar system and represents above-average performance across the tracked dimensions.
A score in this range suggests that a prospective client or organization should find reasonable confidence in this provider's regulatory profile. He is not in the "excellent" band (800–850), which would indicate the highest tier of compliance metrics, but he is well above the "acceptable" threshold (670–739) where concerns might begin to accumulate. The gap between his current score and the maximum is modest—54 points—and is driven primarily by his Practice Profile sub-score rather than disciplinary issues.
Readers should interpret this as: Michael A. Akiva has maintained bar standing and has no significant disciplinary history on record, but there may be factors related to his practice scope or profile that regulators or Verdica's model flag as less developed compared to the highest-scoring peers. This is neither a red flag nor an endorsement—it is a data-driven indicator that warrants a baseline level of due diligence before engagement.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This reflects Michael A. Akiva's current licensure status and compliance with Florida bar requirements. A score of 790 indicates he is in good standing with only minimal deviations or administrative gaps. Providers with lower bar standing scores may have lapsed licenses, active license suspensions, or unresolved regulatory compliance issues. His score here is strong.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no substantive disciplinary findings, complaints upheld by the Florida Bar, or sanctions on record. In the legal industry, disciplinary history is among the most sensitive compliance metrics because it reflects actual regulatory findings—not subjective performance measures. A perfect score means there are no documented violations of professional conduct rules in the available state bar record.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three and accounts for the gap between his composite score and the excellent band. Practice Profile typically reflects factors such as practice area diversity, jurisdiction coverage, years of active practice, or publicly reported case outcomes and specializations. A score of 700 suggests his profile is acceptable but may be narrower, newer, less diversified, or have less public visibility compared to higher-scoring peers. This does not indicate misconduct; it suggests a more limited or specialized footprint.
What regulators in FL track for legal providers
Florida's state bar (The Florida Bar) maintains disciplinary records that capture formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions against attorneys. These records include violations such as misappropriation of client funds, failure to communicate, unauthorized practice, fraud, dishonesty, and breach of fiduciary duties. Verdica indexes these records to assess regulatory risk.
The bar also tracks active licensure status, which requires annual compliance filings, continuing legal education, and payment of dues. Practice history data—including information about areas of practice, years licensed, and publicly available case information—supplements disciplinary records to create a fuller profile.
Scores move up when an attorney maintains continuous licensure, has zero disciplinary findings, and demonstrates established practice credentials. Scores decline with complaints, sanctions, license restrictions, or suspensions. The state bar's records are the primary official source; customer complaints and civil litigation history are separate indicators not captured in this regulatory dataset.
Bottom line
Michael A. Akiva is a strong compliance-profile provider with a clean disciplinary record and solid bar standing. Before engagement, prospective clients should confirm that his practice area and experience level align with their specific legal needs, as his Practice Profile score suggests a narrower scope compared to highest-tier peers.