What Verdica's 807 score means for Michael Harrison, Attorney at Law
Michael Harrison's composite score of 807 out of 850 places him in the "excellent" band (800–850), indicating strong overall compliance standing based on regulatory records. This score reflects a provider with no serious disciplinary flags, active bar standing, and a practice profile consistent with legitimate legal service delivery.
A score in this range signals to potential clients or referring organizations that regulatory data does not show material red flags. It does not mean the provider is perfect or has never faced any issue—it means that when measured against state bar standards and disciplinary history, the compliance profile is robust. For someone evaluating legal service providers, an 807 score suggests lower regulatory risk relative to the baseline population.
However, it's important to note that this score is composite and draws from specific data sources (state bar records). It does not incorporate customer satisfaction reviews—Verdica notes that no independent customer reviews are indexed for this entity yet. Compliance standing and client experience are related but distinct measures. A strong regulatory score is a necessary but not sufficient condition for evaluating a provider.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This reflects Michael Harrison's current status with the New Jersey bar. A score of 790 in this dimension indicates active, clear bar status with no suspension or loss of licensure. Bar standing is a threshold measure—attorneys either hold a valid license or they do not. The slight gap from the maximum (790 vs. 850) may reflect minor administrative data gaps or other non-disciplinary factors tracked by the bar, but the score remains in the strong-to-excellent range, confirming current legal authorization to practice.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no substantive disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions recorded in New Jersey's bar disciplinary database. Attorneys at this level have no history of ethics violations, malpractice settlements flagged by the bar, or conduct violations. A perfect disciplinary score is a significant positive signal—it means regulatory bodies have not found cause to sanction or restrict the provider.
Practice Profile (755/850): This score captures the structure and substance of how the attorney conducts business—areas like practice area consistency, licensing scope, and operational compliance signals evident in bar records. A score of 755 is solid (in the "strong" band of 740–799) but shows modest separation from the maximum. This typically reflects either a newer practice, limited publicly available practice history, or routine operational metrics that don't rise to excellent levels. It does not suggest misconduct; rather, it indicates a standard practice profile without extraordinary indicators of excellence or specialization.
What regulators in NJ track for legal providers
New Jersey's bar disciplinary system monitors attorney conduct across several dimensions. Regulators track ethics complaints, fee disputes, unauthorized practice, conflicts of interest, failure to communicate with clients, and mishandling of client funds. They also maintain records of licensing status, malpractice insurance requirements, and continuing legal education compliance.
Verdica's scoring methodology weights disciplinary history heavily because past regulatory action is one of the strongest predictors of risk. A provider with multiple ethics complaints or sanctions carries higher risk than one with none. Bar standing is a gating factor—an inactive or suspended license is disqualifying. Practice profile looks at how long an attorney has been licensed, what areas they practice in, and whether their operational footprint aligns with professional norms for their jurisdiction and practice type.
These regulatory measures don't capture everything about service quality or client satisfaction, but they do measure whether state oversight bodies have identified problems.
Bottom line
Michael Harrison's 807 score indicates strong regulatory compliance with no disciplinary history and active bar status. Before engaging, verify his specific practice areas, hourly rates or fee structure, and request references—his regulatory standing is solid, but regulatory data doesn't replace due diligence on fit and value for your specific legal needs.