What Verdica's 796 score means for Mr Robert Herbert Bohn Jr
Mr Robert Herbert Bohn Jr's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating above-average compliance standing relative to Connecticut legal providers. This score is built from state bar disciplinary records and practice history data—the core regulatory sources that track attorney licensing, conduct, and professional activity.
A score of 796 means that based on available regulatory data, Mr Bohn Jr presents a relatively low compliance risk profile. Readers should understand this as a positive signal: the underlying records show no major red flags that would warrant elevated caution. However, the score is not in the "excellent" band (800–850), which suggests room exists in one or more compliance dimensions. This is a meaningful distinction. A strong score indicates a track record of professional standing; an excellent score would suggest near-flawless or exemplary records across all measured areas.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating legal services, a 796 score suggests Mr Bohn Jr meets professional standards and has maintained good standing with regulators. It does not, however, carry the same weight as an 820+ score would. The interpretation is straightforward: proceed with normal due diligence, but do not treat this as a universal clean bill of health across all practice dimensions.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
Bar Standing reflects whether an attorney holds an active license, has met continuing education requirements, and maintains the formal credentials required to practice in Connecticut. A score of 790 indicates that Mr Bohn Jr's licensing status and regulatory standing are solid but not flawless. Most attorneys in good standing score in this range or higher. A score below 700 in this dimension would signal licensing concerns, restrictions, or lapses. The 790 score here means his formal credentials are in order.
Disciplinary History: 850
This is the standout sub-score. Disciplinary History measures whether an attorney has had complaints, sanctions, or findings of misconduct recorded by the Connecticut bar. An 850 is the maximum score, indicating no disciplinary records in the data Verdica tracks. This is a strong compliance indicator—it means regulators have not found or recorded professional misconduct, ethics violations, or other formal complaints. This is the primary factor supporting his overall strong composite score.
Practice Profile: 700
Practice Profile evaluates the scope, type, and characteristics of an attorney's practice as reported to the bar. A score of 700 falls into the acceptable band but is the lowest of Mr Bohn Jr's three sub-scores. This dimension can reflect specialization, practice area diversity, client base characteristics, or activity level reported on bar registration forms. A 700 suggests his practice profile is acceptable from a compliance standpoint but may not be as robust or diversified as profiles scoring higher. This is the dimension pulling the composite score below the excellent threshold.
What regulators in CT track for legal providers
Connecticut's bar association maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys, tracking formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions. These records form the backbone of the Disciplinary History sub-score. Infractions tracked include ethics violations (conflicts of interest, client funds mishandling, misrepresentation), professional conduct breaches, and licensing non-compliance. Bar Standing relies on active license verification and continuing legal education compliance. Practice Profile is informed by periodic bar registration filings, where attorneys report their practice areas, employment status, and client-facing activities. A low score in any dimension can result from disciplinary findings, licensing lapses, unmet CLE hours, or practice structure concerns flagged by regulators.
Bottom line
Mr Robert Herbert Bohn Jr's 796 score reflects strong compliance standing with no disciplinary history on record, though his practice profile leaves modest room for improvement relative to the highest-scoring providers. For someone considering engaging his services, the score supports confidence in his regulatory standing, but independent verification of his expertise, references, and fit for your specific legal need remains essential.