What Verdica's 796 score means for Mr Robert Herbert Bohn Jr
Mr Robert Herbert Bohn Jr's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a low-risk profile. This score reflects compliance data drawn from state bar disciplinary records and practice history in DC—the primary sources regulators use to assess attorney fitness and conduct.
A score in the strong band suggests that Mr Bohn has maintained professional licensing in good standing, has not accumulated significant disciplinary findings, and demonstrates an established practice profile. For someone evaluating legal representation or a professional engagement, this score indicates a provider who has cleared baseline regulatory expectations and has not raised material red flags in the eyes of his state bar.
It is important to note that a 796 score is not in the "excellent" band (800–850), which would reflect zero or near-zero disciplinary history paired with a fully developed practice profile. Instead, the strong band reflects real-world practice: most established attorneys operate here, having maintained licensure without major infractions. A reader should interpret this as "meets or exceeds standard expectations" rather than "exceptional among peers."
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 This sub-score reflects Mr Bohn's current licensing status and any sanctions or restrictions imposed by the DC bar. A score of 790 indicates active, good-standing licensure with minimal or no active disciplinary orders, suspensions, or conditions on practice. In the legal industry, bar standing is the floor: an attorney cannot practice without it, and any erosion of standing (inactive status, suspension, disbarred status) would sharply lower this score. Mr Bohn's 790 reflects a licensed professional in clear regulatory standing.
Disciplinary History: 850 This is a perfect score, indicating no substantiated disciplinary findings or complaints in Verdica's indexed state bar records. Disciplinary history tracks formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions—everything from ethics violations to trust account violations to misrepresentation. A score of 850 means no such record exists in the data sources analyzed. This is a positive signal and a significant contributor to his overall composite score.
Practice Profile: 700 This sub-score reflects the scope, longevity, and consistency of Mr Bohn's documented practice. A score of 700 sits at the lower end of the "acceptable" band (670–739) and suggests either a narrower practice scope, a shorter documented practice history, or less extensive public records of practice activity compared to peer benchmarks. This does not indicate misconduct; rather, it reflects what regulators can observe about practice breadth and establishment. An attorney with a long, multi-disciplinary practice history would typically score higher here.
What regulators in DC track for legal providers
The DC bar, like all state bars, maintains disciplinary records that document formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions. These records track infractions such as neglect of client matters, misappropriation of funds, dishonesty, failure to communicate, unauthorized practice, and violation of professional conduct rules. Licensing records show current status, any practice restrictions, and whether an attorney is in good standing.
Practice history data includes bar admission dates, practice areas reported to the bar, any public disciplinary actions, and compliance with continuing legal education requirements. Regulators do not track client satisfaction, case outcomes, or fee disputes unless they rise to a formal bar complaint. Verdica's composite scoring translates these regulatory signals into a single risk metric: higher scores reflect cleaner disciplinary histories and more established practice profiles.
Bottom line
Mr Robert Herbert Bohn Jr's score of 796 indicates a legal provider with clean disciplinary standing and active DC licensure. Before engaging his services, verify that his practice area aligns with your specific legal need, and consider requesting references—Verdica's data reflects regulatory compliance, not client outcomes or specialization.