What Verdica's 838 score means for Patricia Lopez
Patricia Lopez's composite score of 838 out of 850 places her in Verdica's excellent band (800–850), which represents the top tier of legal providers evaluated in the platform. This score reflects strong performance across the measured dimensions of bar standing, disciplinary history, and practice profile.
For a reader evaluating Lopez, an 838 score signals low compliance risk based on state bar records and documented practice activity. The score does not measure client satisfaction alone—21 indexed customer reviews with an average 4.6 out of 5 rating provide independent corroboration of service quality, but the composite score itself is anchored in regulatory data. The gap between Lopez's score (838) and the maximum (850) is 12 points, indicating minor variance in one or more sub-dimensions rather than any material concern. Readers should interpret this as a provider with a clean regulatory standing and an active, documented practice history in Florida.
An 838-rated provider sits well above the "acceptable" threshold (670–739) and the "strong" band (740–799), meaning Lopez meets or exceeds expectations for licensing compliance and professional conduct as measured by state regulators.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 850
A perfect score on bar standing means Patricia Lopez holds an active, unrestricted license to practice law in Florida with no public record flags related to licensure status. Bar standing is the baseline compliance measure—it confirms the provider is legally authorized to practice. A score at the maximum indicates no suspension, inactive status, or administrative holds on record.
Disciplinary History: 850
A perfect disciplinary history score indicates no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or disciplinary findings logged in Florida's state bar records. In the legal industry, this dimension tracks formal ethics complaints, malpractice findings, trust account violations, and other misconduct reported to the bar. A maximum score means a clean record across these categories. This is a strong positive signal but does not guarantee the absence of client disputes outside the formal bar system.
Practice Profile: 790
This sub-score of 790 is the lowest of the three but remains solidly in the excellent band. Practice profile typically reflects factors such as years of licensed practice, documented areas of practice, client volume indicators, and consistency of bar registration filings. A score of 790 suggests Lopez has an established, documented practice history in Florida but may have a narrower specialization, shorter tenure, or less voluminous documented activity compared to providers scoring 800+. This is not a red flag—it is a relative point of differentiation within an otherwise excellent profile.
What regulators in FL track for legal providers
Florida's state bar disciplinary system records formal complaints, ethics violations, and sanctions against licensed attorneys. Infractions that reduce these scores include mishandling client funds, failure to communicate, unauthorized practice, fraud, substance abuse affecting practice, and criminal convictions. Practice history data includes bar registration records, active license status, and any history of temporary suspension or reinstatement.
Regulators do not typically publish detailed fee information, caseload data, or outcome metrics. The bar focuses on minimum ethical and competency thresholds, not comparative quality rankings. A high score confirms compliance with those thresholds; it does not measure case outcomes, client satisfaction, or specialized expertise. Violations are public record, but absence of a violation does not guarantee superior service.
Bottom line
Patricia Lopez's 838 score reflects a legally compliant provider with no public bar disciplinary findings and an active Florida practice. Her independent customer reviews (4.6/5 average) align with her strong regulatory standing. A prospective client should treat this as a positive baseline and cross-check her specific practice area alignment, fee structure, and engagement terms before retention.