What Verdica's 796 score means for Peyman H. Rad
Peyman H. Rad's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating above-average compliance standing within the DC legal market. This score reflects a provider with solid regulatory footing and minimal disciplinary risk exposure based on state bar records and documented practice history.
A score in this band means the provider meets professional standards and licensing requirements without significant red flags in the regulator database. For a business owner or consumer evaluating legal services, a strong score suggests lower compliance risk compared to providers in lower bands. However, it does not indicate perfection—the maximum score of 850 (excellent band) remains unattained. Readers should interpret this as "vetted and low-concern" rather than "flawless," and should still apply standard due diligence when selecting counsel.
The absence of indexed customer reviews does not weaken or strengthen this score; Verdica's composite is built entirely on regulatory data, which is objective and verifiable.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score measures current licensing status and good standing with the DC Bar. A score of 790 is very strong, reflecting active licensure and no ongoing suspension, disbarment, or probationary status. In the legal industry, bar standing is foundational—providers without clear standing cannot legally practice. A high bar standing score confirms the provider is authorized to work.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is the top score available. It indicates no substantive disciplinary findings, complaints upheld, or sanctions in the state bar's historical record. This sub-score is the least forgiving: even minor infractions, ethical violations, or settled complaints will lower it. A perfect 850 here means a clean disciplinary slate according to public records.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score evaluates documented practice experience, specialization areas, and longevity in the market based on bar records and registration data. A score of 700 falls into the "acceptable" band and is the lowest of Rad's three sub-scores. This does not indicate wrongdoing; it typically reflects factors such as recent entry to the market, limited public record of practice areas, or fewer years of documented experience compared to peers. For established practitioners, a score below 750 in this dimension may warrant clarification on the provider's background and focus areas.
What regulators in DC track for legal providers
The District of Columbia Bar and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel maintain records on all licensed attorneys. Regulators track:
- Licensing and good standing: Current bar membership, active status, and any lapses or suspensions.
- Disciplinary history: Complaints filed, investigations conducted, and sanctions imposed (ranging from warnings to disbarment). Public records include ethical violations (conflicts of interest, competence failures, billing disputes), criminal convictions, and law practice rule breaches.
- Practice registration and disclosures: Filed information about practice areas, jurisdictions, firm affiliation, and years in practice. This feeds the practice profile dimension.
These records are the backbone of Verdica's legal provider scores. Infractions that lower scores include failure to communicate with clients, unauthorized practice, misappropriation of funds, false statements to regulators, and other ethical breaches. Scores improve with years of clean discipline and consistent public practice records.
Bottom line
Peyman H. Rad scores in the strong range with excellent disciplinary history and solid bar standing, making him a lower-compliance-risk option. Before engaging, cross-check his practice areas and experience level (the practice profile sub-score) against your specific legal needs, and confirm no recent changes to his bar status outside this report's date.