What Verdica's 796 score means for Peyman H. Rad
Peyman H. Rad's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "excellent" band (800–850 range boundary), indicating strong overall compliance and professional standing. A score in this range reflects minimal regulatory friction and a clean disciplinary record relative to peers in the Florida legal market.
For a business owner or individual considering legal services, a 796 score signals low regulatory risk. The provider has demonstrated consistent adherence to state bar standards and has not accumulated the kinds of violations, complaints, or licensing restrictions that would trigger material concern. This score is built on verifiable state bar data—not subjective opinion—so it reflects how Florida's regulatory body views the provider's conduct and credentials.
That said, a 796 is not a perfect 850. The gap of 54 points suggests there are minor areas where the provider's profile diverges slightly from top-tier benchmarks in the legal industry. Understanding where those gaps lie (addressed in the sub-score breakdown below) helps contextualize the overall strength of the rating.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects the provider's active licensing status, credential verification, and absence of suspension or revocation. A 790 indicates that Peyman H. Rad holds a valid license in Florida and has not faced action that would restrict his ability to practice. The minor gap from a perfect score may reflect either routine licensing maintenance items, or slight deviations from best practices in the regulatory filing or standing renewal process—common in high-volume professional populations. In the legal industry, bar standing is the baseline compliance measure; providers with scores below 700 in this dimension typically face active restrictions or non-compliance.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score. No disciplinary actions, complaints upheld, sanctions, or censures appear in the Florida state bar record for Peyman H. Rad. This reflects the cleanest possible regulatory history and is the strongest signal Verdica can provide about past conduct and client protection.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score aggregates information about the provider's case history, areas of practice, experience level, and any patterns in the types of matters handled. A 700 places this dimension in the "acceptable" to "strong" range. The gap here—50 points below the top—may reflect factors such as limited public case data, a narrower practice scope, or a shorter verifiable practice history relative to peers. In regulatory terms, this is not a red flag; it simply indicates the provider's profile is less extensively documented in public records, or operates in a practice area with lower public case volume.
What regulators in FL track for legal providers
Florida's state bar maintains disciplinary records that capture professional misconduct allegations, including ethics violations, malpractice complaints, fee disputes, unauthorized practice, neglect, and dishonesty. Verdica ingests these records to assess risk. Providers with histories of upheld complaints, paid restitution, suspensions, or disbarment receive substantially lower scores.
Bar standing verification checks active licensing, character and fitness compliance, and whether a provider has ever been subject to interim suspension or restrictions. Practice profile analysis reviews publicly available case filings, bar records, and historical work patterns to gauge experience and specialization.
Regulators do not track customer satisfaction or case outcomes directly in disciplinary records—those metrics require independent customer review data, which Verdica separately solicits but has not yet collected for this provider.
Bottom line
Peyman H. Rad presents a low-risk compliance profile with excellent bar standing and a clean disciplinary record. Before engaging, verify that his practice area matches your legal needs (the practice profile score suggests room to confirm scope and depth) and consider seeking independent references if case-specific experience is critical to your decision.