What Verdica's 796 score means for Richard Alexander
Richard Alexander's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), which reflects a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and minimal compliance risk. This score is built on verifiable state bar records and practice history, the primary data sources regulators and the public rely on to assess attorney fitness.
A score in this range signals that Richard Alexander meets baseline professional standards and has maintained good standing with the Colorado bar. The gap between 796 and the "excellent" threshold (800–850) is modest—just four points—meaning his profile reflects strong compliance without perfection. For someone evaluating whether to engage his services, this score suggests low regulatory risk and a track record that does not raise red flags from state disciplinary authorities.
It's important to note that Verdica's scoring is based on regulatory data only; no independent customer reviews are yet indexed for Richard Alexander. That means the score reflects compliance and licensing health, not client satisfaction or work quality. A reader should interpret this as a regulatory green light, not a complete measure of service value.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
This sub-score reflects Richard Alexander's active license status and good standing with the Colorado bar. A score of 790 in this dimension indicates he is in full compliance with bar admission requirements, fee obligations, and license renewal standards. Attorneys with low bar standing scores typically face license suspension, restricted practice, or lapsed renewal. His 790 suggests his administrative and licensing record is clean.
Disciplinary History: 850
This is the highest possible sub-score, indicating no substantiated disciplinary complaints or sanctions on record with the Colorado bar. In the legal profession, disciplinary records track ethics violations, malpractice findings, fee disputes, or misconduct substantiated by the bar's complaint process. A perfect score means Richard Alexander has not been subject to formal disciplinary action. This is a strong indicator of compliance with professional conduct rules.
Practice Profile: 700
This sub-score, the lowest of the three, sits in the "acceptable" range and reflects his practice history as recorded by the bar. Practice profile scoring typically factors in years of active practice, practice area consistency, and any changes in licensure type or status. A 700 suggests a solid but straightforward practice footprint—no anomalies or licensing complications, but also no distinguishing factors that elevate the score further. This is a neutral-to-positive indicator for routine legal services.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
Colorado's bar disciplinary system, overseen by the Colorado Supreme Court, maintains records on all licensed attorneys' conduct and status. The regulatory data Verdica uses includes:
- Licensing and renewal compliance: active status, timely fee payments, and continuing legal education credits.
- Disciplinary complaints and findings: substantiated violations of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, including conflicts of interest, fee disputes, failure to communicate, or mishandling of client funds.
- Sanctions and remedies: public reprimands, license suspension, probation, or disbarment.
- Practice history: changes in practice type, firm affiliations, and solo/group practice status over time.
These records are public and searchable. They do not measure case outcomes, client satisfaction, or expertise depth—only regulatory compliance and ethics enforcement. A clean record indicates an attorney has not been found to have violated professional conduct rules, while a strong bar standing score confirms current eligibility to practice.
Bottom line
Richard Alexander's 796 score indicates a legally compliant provider with no disciplinary history and solid bar standing. For someone evaluating whether to work with him, this score is a reliable regulatory checkpoint. To make a fully informed decision, you should independently verify his specific practice areas, experience level, and whether any customer references or case outcomes align with your needs—data points beyond what regulatory scoring captures.