What Verdica's 796 score means for Richard Alexander
Richard Alexander's composite score of 796 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), which reflects consistent professional standing and minimal regulatory risk. A score in this range indicates a legal provider who has maintained good standing with the Connecticut bar, has not accumulated significant disciplinary issues, and demonstrates a practice profile aligned with professional norms.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating legal services, a 796 score signals reliability relative to the regulatory baseline. This is not an "excellent" rating (800–850), which would indicate exceptional track record or above-average performance metrics. Rather, it reflects a solid professional standing—someone who meets the bar's core requirements and has not triggered regulatory concerns that would lower the score. The gap of 54 points from the top of the scale suggests room exists in one or more sub-categories, though nothing in the data provided indicates active risk or concern.
A reader should interpret this score as: Richard Alexander is a low-risk choice from a compliance and disciplinary standpoint, but should still be evaluated on service quality, expertise fit, and cost—dimensions that fall outside Verdica's regulatory scoring model.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790): This sub-score reflects Richard Alexander's current active license status and compliance with Connecticut bar membership requirements. A score of 790 is strong and indicates that his license is in good standing and he meets the state's continuing education, fee, and ethical enrollment obligations. A higher score in this dimension would typically be 800+, suggesting flawless compliance history; a lower score might signal lapsed fees, temporary suspensions, or probationary status.
Disciplinary History (850): This is the highest possible sub-score, indicating zero or near-zero disciplinary actions on his regulatory record. In legal practice, disciplinary history encompasses complaints, investigations, sanctions, and ethics violations tracked by the state bar. An 850 score means Richard Alexander's professional conduct record is clean by state bar standards. This is a strong indicator of compliance with ethics rules, client trust obligations, and professional conduct rules.
Practice Profile (700): This sub-score, at 700, is the lowest of the three and falls into the "acceptable" band (670–739) rather than "strong." Practice profile typically reflects licensing scope, practice areas, disciplinary trends within the provider's stated practice, and alignment with reported experience. A score of 700 suggests his practice profile is compliant but may have characteristics that prevent a higher rating—such as a narrow scope of practice, limited public record of specialization, or routine practice activity without distinction. This is not a red flag; it simply indicates average positioning within the profession.
What regulators in CT track for legal providers
Connecticut's bar disciplinary system, overseen by the Connecticut Bar Examining Committee and integrated into the state bar's Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel, maintains records on attorney conduct across several dimensions:
Licensing & standing: Active membership status, continuing legal education (CLE) compliance, and annual dues.
Disciplinary matters: Complaints from clients, opposing counsel, or the public; investigations into alleged ethical violations; and sanctions ranging from reprimands to suspension or disbarment.
Ethics violations: Breaches of Connecticut Practice Book rules (analogous to Model Rules of Professional Conduct), including issues related to client funds, conflicts of interest, truthfulness, and competence.
Practice history: Areas of practice, jurisdictional limitations, and complaint patterns within specific practice areas.
Verdica's scoring model pulls from these public records to derive the sub-scores. Movements in disciplinary history or bar standing typically follow formal state bar action; practice profile incorporates broader pattern data and licensed scope.
Bottom line
Richard Alexander's 796 score reflects strong regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record, making him a low-compliance-risk choice. Before engaging, verify his specific practice expertise matches your legal need, confirm fee arrangements, and check references—areas outside Verdica's regulatory scope.