What Verdica's 796 score means for Rick Cofer
Rick Cofer's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid compliance credentials and professional standing. A score in this range reflects a track record that meets or exceeds regulatory expectations, with no significant red flags in the underlying disciplinary or practice data.
For a reader evaluating whether to engage with this provider, a 796 score suggests reasonable confidence based on state bar records. This is not an "excellent" rating (800–850), which would indicate near-perfect compliance history, nor is it in the "acceptable" range (670–739), which signals mixed signals requiring closer review. The "strong" classification means the provider has demonstrated competence and regulatory compliance, but there is room between this score and the highest tier—a distinction worth noting for clients seeking maximum reassurance.
The score reflects data from Delaware's state bar disciplinary records and practice history, the primary sources regulators use to track legal provider conduct. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed, so this assessment is based entirely on official regulatory data rather than client feedback.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Rick Cofer's current license status and compliance with admission requirements set by the Delaware bar. A score of 790 is very strong and indicates the provider maintains active, valid licensure without current restrictions or suspensions. A decline in this metric would typically signal license probation, temporary suspension, or conditions placed on practice—none of which are present here.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no substantiated disciplinary actions, complaints upheld by the bar, or formal sanctions in the indexed records. This is the strongest possible indicator in this dimension. A lower disciplinary score would reflect formal complaints, ethics violations, malpractice findings, or other regulatory actions documented in state bar files.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three, though still in acceptable range, and reflects factors related to how Rick Cofer's practice is structured and reported to regulators. Practice profile metrics may include specialization areas, client base characteristics, office locations, or other operational data the bar collects. A score of 700 suggests the practice profile is solid but may have less distinction or transparency than the highest-rated practices. This could reflect a more modest practice scale, limited specialization documentation, or other neutral operational factors—not necessarily compliance concerns.
What regulators in DE track for legal providers
Delaware's state bar maintains disciplinary records that document formal complaints, ethics violations, and sanctions. These infractions range from minor violations (administrative warnings) to serious misconduct (disbarment). Regulators track licensing compliance, continuing legal education requirements, trust account management, conflicts of interest, and adherence to professional conduct rules.
Practice history data includes admission dates, office locations, practice areas, and any modifications to licensure status. Regulators also note whether a provider has faced malpractice claims, fee disputes, or other matters that surface in disciplinary proceedings. Movement in compliance scores typically reflects changes in any of these categories—new disciplinary actions lower scores, while years without substantiated complaints sustain or improve standing.
Bottom line
Rick Cofer presents a strong compliance profile based on state bar records, with a perfect disciplinary history and solid bar standing. A potential client or business partner should verify that his practice areas align with their needs and consider requesting references or engagement terms, but nothing in this score suggests elevated regulatory risk.