What Verdica's 838 score means for Robert Jones
Robert Jones's composite score of 838 out of 850 places him in the "excellent" range (800–850), reflecting a legal provider with strong standing across the measured compliance dimensions. This score is based on indexed state bar disciplinary records and practice history data—the primary regulatory touchpoints for attorneys in Texas.
A score in this band indicates that the provider has maintained good standing with the state bar, has no or minimal disciplinary history, and operates within established practice norms. It does not mean the provider is perfect, nor does it guarantee outcome quality or customer satisfaction—no single score can. Rather, it reflects what state regulators have visibility into: licensing status, formal complaints, and professional conduct records.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating Robert Jones, this score suggests a low regulatory risk profile. It means there are no public red flags in the disciplinary system and that his bar standing is current. Someone considering engagement should view this as a baseline of compliance credibility, not a complete due diligence substitute. Independent customer reviews, references, and cost/scope discussions remain important steps in any vendor relationship.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 850. This perfect sub-score reflects current, active licensing with the state bar in Texas. An attorney must maintain bar membership and meet continuing education, ethical, and fee-regulation requirements to keep this status. A score of 850 here means there are no public licensing suspensions, lapses, or reinstatement requirements on record.
Disciplinary History: 850. This perfect score indicates no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or formal discipline recorded in the Texas state bar's public disciplinary system. Disciplinary actions typically arise from complaints about conduct violations—billing fraud, neglect, dishonesty, conflicts of interest, or other ethical breaches. A high score here suggests the provider has not triggered formal regulatory enforcement, though it does not preclude informal complaints or client disputes that were never filed with the bar.
Practice Profile: 790. This score is lower than the other two, though still in the "strong" range (740–799). Practice profile typically reflects patterns in how an attorney reports their practice—areas of focus, client base, matter types, and operational structure. A score of 790 suggests the practice profile is consistent with state bar requirements but may include some structural or reporting elements that are less common or harder to verify against public records. This is the least precise sub-score because it relies on registration data and reported information, not clear-cut compliance metrics like licensing or discipline.
What regulators in TX track for legal providers
The State Bar of Texas maintains a public disciplinary database that includes all formal actions against attorneys: suspensions, disbarments, public reprimands, and probations. These actions result from complaints investigated under the bar's ethics rules, which cover conduct including neglect, inadequate communication, fee disputes, conflicts of interest, and dishonest dealings.
The bar also tracks active licensing and continuing legal education (CLE) compliance. Attorneys must renew their licenses and complete CLE hours annually to remain eligible to practice. Non-compliance triggers administrative discipline or license suspension.
Practice history data includes registration of office locations, areas of practice, and disciplinary history. This information is publicly accessible through the bar's attorney search function. Verdica indexes this public data to populate scores.
Scores move downward when complaints are filed, substantiated, and result in formal sanctions. They also move downward if licensing lapses, CLE is not completed, or practice registration is incomplete or inconsistent. Movement upward is slower—essentially, scores improve by maintaining clean records over time.
Bottom line
Robert Jones's 838 score reflects a compliant, low-risk legal provider by state regulatory measures. Before engaging, cross-check bar standing independently, confirm specific experience in your legal area, and review any available client references or cost estimates. A high Verdica score signals regulatory credibility but is not a substitute for direct vetting.