What Verdica's 796 score means for Russell Wilson Crumbley
Russell Wilson Crumbley's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating solid regulatory standing and professional compliance. This score reflects a track record without significant disciplinary red flags and a practice profile consistent with active legal practice in Florida.
A score in this range suggests that a prospective client or business partner can proceed with reasonable confidence in the provider's regulatory standing. The score is not "excellent" (800–850)—which would signal an exceptionally clean record or exceptional practice indicators—but it meaningfully exceeds the "acceptable" threshold (670–739) and sits well above any elevated-risk or high-risk zones. For a consumer evaluating legal services, a 796 score indicates the provider has met Florida's baseline compliance expectations and has not triggered major disciplinary action.
The data underlying this score comes from state bar disciplinary records and practice history, meaning the metrics reflect what regulators have formally documented, not subjective reputation measures. No independent customer reviews have been indexed yet, so this analysis is limited to official regulatory data.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
This sub-score reflects Crumbley's current licensure status and compliance with Florida bar membership requirements. A score of 790 in this dimension indicates active, good standing with the Florida bar. Bar standing can decline due to license suspensions, lapses in continuing legal education, failure to pay bar dues, or other administrative violations. A score in the high 700s suggests Crumbley maintains current licensing and has not faced material barriers to practice.
Disciplinary History: 850
This is a maximum score, indicating no record of formal disciplinary action in the Florida bar's public database. Disciplinary history tracks complaints investigated by the bar, sanctions imposed (ranging from warnings to disbarment), and public reprimands. A perfect 850 means no such actions appear on record. This is a strong indicator, though it does not guarantee absence of complaints—some may be pending, dismissed, or confidential under bar rules.
Practice Profile: 700
This sub-score is the lowest of the three and reflects observable characteristics of Crumbley's legal practice as documented by bar records: areas of practice, jurisdictions served, years active, and possibly case volume or client type data. A score of 700 falls in the "acceptable" band for this dimension. This may indicate a narrower practice footprint, less extensive client engagement data in public records, or a practice profile that does not trigger premium indicators. It is neither a warning sign nor a mark of distinction—it is standard.
What regulators in FL track for legal providers
The Florida Bar maintains public disciplinary records that document formal actions against attorneys for violations of professional conduct rules. These include breaches of client confidentiality, dishonest conduct, failure to return client funds, inadequate representation, and violations of advertising or fee-sharing rules. Infractions can result in disbarment, suspension, censure, or public reprimand. Bar Standing scores reflect whether an attorney maintains an active license and meets administrative requirements.
Practice history in Florida bar records can include information on years of admission, areas of practice concentration, and jurisdictional qualifications. Some bar databases also track case filings or disciplinary complaint patterns over time. A lower Practice Profile score may reflect limited public data, a narrower practice scope, or insufficient history, while higher scores often correlate with established practices with visible case activity or multiple practice areas.
Regulators do not typically publish client satisfaction metrics or detailed performance reviews; they focus on compliance with ethics rules and licensing requirements.
Bottom line
Crumbley's 796 score reflects a strong regulatory standing with no public disciplinary record and active bar membership. Before engaging services, verify his specific practice areas and experience align with your needs, and consider requesting references or case examples, since the score speaks to compliance, not specialized capability or client outcomes.