What Verdica's 796 score means for Russell Wilson Crumbley
Russell Wilson Crumbley's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" performance band (740–799), which reflects solid regulatory standing and professional practice history. This score sits just below the "excellent" threshold (800–850) and well above the midpoint of acceptable compliance.
A score in this range signals that regulators have found no major disciplinary concerns and that documented practice activity aligns with professional standards. For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, a 796 score indicates lower compliance risk compared to the general legal market. However, it is not the highest possible rating, meaning there may be room for improvement in one or more compliance dimensions. Readers should interpret this as a provider with a solid track record rather than a spotless one.
The absence of indexed customer reviews means this assessment is drawn purely from regulatory data—state bar standing and disciplinary history—rather than client feedback. That limits the full picture but does not diminish the weight of the regulatory findings.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 Bar Standing measures whether a provider maintains active, unrestricted licensure and compliance with state regulatory requirements. A score of 790 is strong but not perfect. This typically indicates the provider holds valid bar status in DC and has met continuing legal education and licensing renewal obligations. The sub-score being slightly lower than the disciplinary score suggests there may be minor administrative matters or restricted practice areas, though nothing that prevents active practice.
Disciplinary History: 850 Disciplinary History is the highest-scoring sub-component and reflects the state bar's formal record of complaints, investigations, and sanctions. A perfect 850 means no substantiated disciplinary actions appear in DC bar records. This is the cleanest possible outcome and represents a significant strength in the provider's compliance profile.
Practice Profile: 700 Practice Profile evaluates the scope, consistency, and documentation of legal work activity. A score of 700 sits at the lower end of the "acceptable" range and is the restraining factor in the overall composite. This sub-score may indicate limited documented practice history, concentrated specialization in fewer practice areas, or less frequent regulatory engagement compared to high-volume practitioners. It does not signal misconduct; rather, it reflects the volume or breadth of verifiable professional activity.
What regulators in DC track for legal providers
The DC bar and Verdica's underlying data rely on several key compliance measures:
Disciplinary records capture formal complaints from clients or opposing counsel that result in investigation. Common infractions include failure to communicate, breach of fiduciary duty, commingling client funds, missed deadlines, and fraudulent conduct. Substantiated violations typically result in reprimand, suspension, or disbarment.
Bar standing requires annual licensing renewal, proof of malpractice insurance, and completion of continuing legal education (CLE) credits. Administrative lapses—missed renewals or CLE shortfalls—can restrict or suspend practice.
Practice history documents public information such as case filings, pro bono work, published opinions, and regulatory filings. Regulators use this to track activity levels and verify that licensed attorneys remain actively engaged in practice rather than dormant.
These measures are designed to protect consumers and maintain profession-wide standards. A high score across all three dimensions is rare and suggests an attorney who renews promptly, avoids substantiated complaints, and maintains visible practice activity.
Bottom line
Russell Wilson Crumbley's 796 score reflects a legally compliant provider with a clean disciplinary record and active bar status. The lower Practice Profile sub-score warrants a brief check into specific areas of focus or case types handled before engagement, but overall compliance risk is low. Verify that his practice areas align with your needs and consider requesting references or case examples.