What Verdica's 796 score means for Samer Habbas
Samer Habbas holds a composite Verdica score of 796 out of 850, placing him in the "strong" band (740–799). This means his profile presents low compliance risk based on the data available through Delaware's state bar disciplinary records and practice history.
A score in this range indicates that a legal provider has maintained good standing with their regulator and does not carry a notable disciplinary record. It reflects consistency in meeting licensing and professional conduct standards. Readers should interpret this as a favorable signal—the provider has not triggered significant regulatory concerns—but the score itself is not a guarantee of service quality, expertise in a specific practice area, or client satisfaction. The 796 is a compliance baseline, not a performance review.
The gap between this score (796) and the maximum (850) suggests room exists in one or more dimensions. This is typical and does not indicate a problem; it simply reflects how Verdica's methodology distributes scores across measured factors.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790 / 850): This sub-score reflects Samer Habbas's current license status and active enrollment with the Delaware bar. A score of 790 indicates he is in good standing and authorized to practice. Bar standing scores decline if a license is suspended, inactive, or restricted. The near-maximum value here shows no active licensing issues.
Disciplinary History (850 / 850): This is a perfect score. It means Verdica's review of Delaware state bar disciplinary records found no substantiated complaints, sanctions, disbarments, or formal disciplinary actions on file. In the legal industry, a clean disciplinary record is foundational to credibility; regulators track complaints ranging from ethical violations to financial misconduct. A perfect score in this dimension is significant and uncommon.
Practice Profile (700 / 850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three but remains within acceptable range. Practice profile typically reflects the scope, consistency, and regulatory footprint of a provider's work—factors like years in practice, jurisdictional scope, and any public records indicating specialization or focus areas. A score of 700 suggests a solid but not exceptional profile by Verdica's measurement; this might indicate a newer practitioner, a narrower geographic or subject-matter focus, or limited public record history. Without additional data, no inference should be drawn about capability or quality.
What regulators in DE track for legal providers
Delaware's bar association maintains disciplinary records as the primary compliance oversight mechanism for attorneys. These records document formal complaints filed against providers, investigation outcomes, and any sanctions imposed. Infractions tracked include breach of fiduciary duty, failure to communicate with clients, misappropriation of funds, unauthorized practice, dishonesty, and violations of professional conduct rules.
Bar standing requires active membership, current insurance (where mandated), and compliance with continuing legal education requirements. Practice history—the secondary data source Verdica uses—includes information on jurisdictions where an attorney is licensed, areas of practice focus, and tenure in the profession. Regulators do not typically track client satisfaction or case outcomes; their mandate is narrow: ensuring providers remain eligible to practice and do not engage in misconduct.
Scores move up or down based on the absence or presence of substantiated disciplinary action, changes in license status, and the breadth and depth of documented practice history. A provider with no history of complaints and consistent active practice will score higher than one with gaps in standing or documented violations.
Bottom line
Samer Habbas presents a strong compliance profile with no disciplinary history and current good bar standing in Delaware. Anyone considering retaining him should verify his specific practice areas align with their needs, confirm he maintains malpractice insurance, and request references—none of which this score measures. The 796 score is a green light on regulatory compliance, not a substitute for due diligence on fit and track record.