What Verdica's 796 score means for Scott D. Cohen
Scott D. Cohen's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" performance band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record, but room remains in one or more dimensions—most likely practice profile—to reach the "excellent" tier (800–850).
For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, a score in this range signals low compliance risk. The attorney has maintained active bar standing and has not accumulated disciplinary sanctions that would trigger concerns. That said, the score is not perfect; it suggests the provider's practice profile—how Verdica measures scope, specialization, or other observable practice metrics—may be narrower or less developed than peers scoring in the 800+ range. This does not indicate a problem; rather, it reflects a difference in professional footprint or data availability.
Readers should interpret this score as "qualified and trustworthy, with a track record Verdica's underlying regulators have vetted." It is a materially stronger signal than the "acceptable" band (670–739) and indicates minimal regulatory friction in the recent history Verdica indexes.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
This sub-score reflects Scott D. Cohen's current licensure and good standing with the Colorado bar. A score this high (and very close to the composite) indicates the attorney holds an active, unrestricted license. In the legal industry, bar standing is the foundation of professional legitimacy; any suspension, disbarment, or active probation would drop this score significantly. A 790 on this dimension tells you the attorney is authorized to practice and has not faced license-limiting sanctions.
Disciplinary History: 850
This is a perfect score, meaning Verdica's indexed disciplinary records show no substantiated violations, ethics complaints, or sanctions on file. In plain terms: there is no record of regulatory action against this attorney. This is the strongest possible signal in this dimension and reflects clean history within the scope of Colorado bar disciplinary databases that Verdica monitors.
Practice Profile: 700
This sub-score is the relative weak point and explains why the composite sits in "strong" rather than "excellent." A practice profile score of 700 typically reflects either limited data on file, a narrower scope of practice, or reduced public visibility compared to higher-scoring peers. This might indicate fewer indexed cases, a specialized niche, or younger practice history. It does not flag misconduct or risk; it simply means the measurable practice footprint is smaller or less documented than attorneys scoring 750+ on this dimension.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
Colorado's state bar disciplinary system, which Verdica indexes, monitors several dimensions:
- License status and restrictions: Whether an attorney holds an active license, faces probation, suspension, or disbarment.
- Complaint history: Ethics complaints, grievances, or disciplinary proceedings initiated by clients, courts, or the bar itself.
- Substantiated violations: Rule breaches, including mishandling client funds, conflicts of interest, false statements, incompetence, or conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
- Sanctions imposed: Public discipline outcomes such as reprimands, fines, suspensions, or disbarment.
- Practice history and scope: Public records on practice areas, case involvement, and professional tenure.
Scores move up when attorneys maintain clean disciplinary records and have verifiable, active practice profiles. Scores move down when complaints are filed, violations are substantiated, or license restrictions apply. Colorado bar records are public and form the compliance backbone of Verdica's index for this state.
Bottom line
Scott D. Cohen scores in the "strong" range with perfect disciplinary standing and active licensing, making him a low-risk choice from a regulatory compliance perspective. Before engaging, cross-check his practice profile directly—his website, bar listing, or case history—to confirm his experience aligns with your specific legal need, since his practice profile score suggests a more focused or specialized footprint than some peers.