What Verdica's 807 score means for Stewart, Zlimen & Jungers, Attorneys, Ltd.
Stewart, Zlimen & Jungers, Attorneys, Ltd. has earned a composite score of 807 out of 850, placing the firm in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong overall compliance and professional standing based on publicly available state bar data. A reader should interpret this as a signal that the firm has maintained good regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record relative to Minnesota legal practice standards. The score does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement; rather, it reflects what regulators track and publish about the firm's licensing status and formal conduct history. Scores in the excellent band indicate low regulatory friction, but the absence of indexed customer reviews means prospective clients have no independent feedback data to cross-reference against the regulatory metrics.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790 / 850): This sub-score measures whether attorneys and the firm maintain active licensure, hold required credentials, and comply with registration requirements set by the Minnesota State Bar. A score of 790 is strong but not perfect, suggesting the firm is in good standing with no active license suspensions or lapses. The slight gap from a maximum score may reflect routine administrative details or historical licensing updates that regulators record but do not consider misconduct.
Disciplinary History (850 / 850): This is a perfect score, indicating no substantiated disciplinary complaints, sanctions, or ethical violations in the state bar's public record. In the legal industry, a clean disciplinary record is the baseline expectation; a perfect score here means Verdica found no formal complaints upheld against the firm's attorneys regarding professional conduct, trust account violations, misrepresentation, or other matters the bar investigates.
Practice Profile (755 / 850): This sub-score reflects the firm's scope of practice, experience, focus areas, and whether its stated work aligns with licensing and regulatory oversight patterns. A score of 755 is "acceptable-to-strong" and suggests the firm's practice history is consistent with its bar credentials and does not raise red flags in scope or scope creep. The gap between this and the disciplinary score may indicate normal variation in how regulators document practice patterns rather than concern.
What regulators in MN track for legal providers
Minnesota's state bar maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys and law firms. The bar investigates complaints related to professional conduct, competence, fraud, trust account mismanagement, conflicts of interest, and violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Licensing records track whether attorneys maintain required continuing legal education (CLE), pay bar dues, and renew their licenses on schedule.
Verdica indexes publicly available disciplinary histories and bar standing data to compute scores. Infractions that would lower a score include upheld complaints, suspensions, disbarments, public reprimands, restrictions on practice, trust account violations, and practice-area licensing violations. Conversely, firms with no substantiated complaints and current, unrestricted licenses score higher. Practice profile data includes the types of legal work a firm advertises or is known to perform, the geographic scope, and whether that aligns with the firm's stated credentials and bar record.
The regulatory data does not capture customer satisfaction, billing practices, or case outcomes—only formal bar action. A firm can have a high score and still face client disputes that do not rise to a formal bar complaint.
Bottom line
Stewart, Zlimen & Jungers, Attorneys, Ltd. presents a strong regulatory profile with an 807 score and a perfect disciplinary record. Someone considering the firm should rely on this score as evidence of compliance with Minnesota bar standards, but should also seek independent customer references or reviews and clarify fees, scope, and representation terms directly with the firm, since no indexed customer feedback is yet available for this provider.