What Verdica's 838 score means for Susan Adams
Susan Adams holds a composite compliance score of 838 out of 850, placing her in Verdica's highest tier: the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a clean regulatory profile based on data from New York state bar disciplinary records and practice history records.
For a reader evaluating Susan Adams as a legal provider, this score indicates that there are no material disciplinary findings or practice red flags in the indexed regulatory data. The high score is driven by perfect marks in two of three weighted dimensions: Bar Standing and Disciplinary History both scored at the maximum (850). The Practice Profile sub-score of 790, while lower, remains in the "strong" range and does not materially detract from the overall excellent rating.
What this means practically: Susan Adams meets or exceeds the compliance baseline that New York's bar association maintains for active practitioners. No customer reviews are yet indexed on this profile, so the score is based entirely on official regulatory records. A prospective client or referring attorney should interpret this as a signal that regulatory authorities have not identified compliance issues with her licensure, conduct, or documented practice activities. This does not constitute a guarantee of service quality, but it does indicate the absence of disciplinary action or licensing restrictions at the state level.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (850/850)
Bar Standing measures whether a legal provider maintains active, clear licensure with the state bar and has no restrictions, suspensions, or conditions placed on their license. A perfect score of 850 means Susan Adams holds a current, unrestricted license to practice law in New York. This is a binary check in regulatory terms—either a license is in good standing or it is not.
Disciplinary History (850/850)
Disciplinary History captures whether a lawyer has been the subject of formal complaints, ethical violations, or sanctions issued by the state bar's disciplinary authority. A score of 850 indicates no substantiated disciplinary record in the indexed data. In the legal industry, this dimension typically moves downward when a provider faces complaints related to client trust account mismanagement, failure to communicate, conflicts of interest, dishonesty, or competence issues. The absence of such findings is reflected in this perfect sub-score.
Practice Profile (790/850)
Practice Profile is a composite of available practice history data—including years in practice, firm affiliations, practice areas, and jurisdiction breadth. A score of 790 is considered "strong" but suggests some variation from a maximum profile. This could reflect a narrower practice area specialization, a shorter tenure, limited geographic footprint, or other factors that regulators document. Without independent customer reviews or detailed practice metrics, this score should be read as: Susan Adams has a documented practice history that is professionally sound, though perhaps more limited in scope than providers scoring in the 800+ range on this dimension.
What regulators in NY track for legal providers
New York's bar disciplinary system, overseen by the Appellate Division and supported by the state bar's ethics hotline and complaint intake, maintains records on several key compliance dimensions:
- License status: active, inactive, suspended, or revoked
- Disciplinary findings: substantiated complaints involving ethics rules, including Rules of Professional Conduct violations
- Sanctions: public censure, suspension, disbarment, or conditions on practice
- Trust account violations: mishandling of client funds
- Jurisdictional restrictions: limitations on practice areas or clients
- Mandatory continuing legal education (CLE): compliance with annual requirements
Verdica indexes these public records to compute scores. A provider's score moves upward with clean history and moves downward when formal findings, sanctions, or licensing restrictions are recorded. Practice history data (years licensed, past firms, recorded practice areas) provides context around specialization and experience breadth.
Bottom line
Susan Adams presents a low-risk compliance profile based on regulatory data, with no disciplinary history and active, unrestricted licensure in New York. Before engaging her services, verify that her practice area and experience align with your specific needs, and consider requesting client references or case examples, since no independent reviews are yet indexed for her profile.