What Verdica's 807 score means for The Dunning Law Firm APC
The Dunning Law Firm APC in Arizona achieved a composite score of 807 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong overall compliance standing based on state bar records and documented practice history. A reader should interpret this as a provider with a clean disciplinary record and consistent licensure status—indicators that regulators have found no material concerns about the firm's conduct or qualifications.
The 807 score does not mean the firm is perfect or superior in all operational dimensions; rather, it reflects what regulators can verify through public records. The score sits near the top of the range but leaves room for other firms to score higher, suggesting no exceptional accolades or distinctions in the data, only solid compliance. For a business owner or consumer, an 800+ rating means the firm has not triggered significant regulatory action and maintains good standing—a baseline for confidence, not a guarantee of quality or outcome.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790 / 850): This sub-score reflects the firm's current licensure status and regulatory recognition. A score of 790 is strong but not perfect, indicating the firm is in good standing with the Arizona bar but may have minor administrative flags or technical issues on file. In the legal industry, bar standing is the foundation of trust—it verifies that lawyers are licensed to practice and that the state bar has no active restrictions on their ability to work.
Disciplinary History (850 / 850): This is a perfect score, meaning no public disciplinary records, complaints, or sanctions are indexed in Arizona's state bar disciplinary database. A perfect disciplinary score is noteworthy because it indicates the firm has not faced formal complaints that resulted in bar action, fines, suspensions, or disbarments. It does not mean the firm has never faced complaints; it means regulators either did not substantiate claims or resolved them without formal discipline.
Practice Profile (755 / 850): This sub-score is notably lower than the other two, sitting in the "strong" band but not "excellent." Practice profile typically reflects documented practice areas, client base, case history, and consistency of operations as reported to the bar. A 755 suggests the firm maintains compliant operations but may have less extensive or diversified practice documentation, newer establishment, or fewer reported engagements compared to highly established firms. This is a contextual indicator, not a red flag.
What regulators in AZ track for legal providers
Arizona's State Bar of Arizona maintains public disciplinary records that document attorney and firm conduct complaints, investigations, and outcomes. Regulators track violations such as failure to return client funds, misrepresentation, conflict of interest, inadequate client communication, and unauthorized practice. They also monitor licensure status, continuing legal education compliance, and trust account management.
Practice history data includes reported practice areas, years in operation, malpractice insurance history, and documented engagements or settlements. The bar does not rate quality of legal work directly; instead, regulators enforce ethical rules and procedural requirements. A higher practice profile score generally indicates longer track record, consistent bar filings, and fewer gaps or inconsistencies in reported operations. Lower practice profile scores can reflect newer firms, limited documentation, or inconsistent reporting—none of which inherently signals misconduct.
Bottom line
The Dunning Law Firm APC scores in the excellent compliance range with a clean disciplinary record, making it a low-risk choice from a regulatory standpoint. Before engaging the firm, cross-check the practice areas and experience level against your specific legal needs, since the practice profile sub-score suggests room for deeper vetting of their documented track record and specializations.