What Verdica's 796 score means for Wade B Coye
Wade B Coye's Verdica composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" performance band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record, though with some variation in practice profile metrics.
A score in the strong band indicates that regulators have found no significant compliance red flags, and the provider's licensing and conduct history do not present elevated risk. For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, a 796 score suggests a practitioner who meets professional standards and has maintained good standing with the California State Bar. However, the score is not in the "excellent" band (800–850), which means there are areas where practice patterns or credentials differ from top-tier benchmarks. Readers should understand this as a solid, low-risk provider—not a warning signal, but not a perfect record either.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Wade B Coye's current licensing status and standing with the California State Bar. A score of 790 indicates the provider is in good standing with the bar, meaning their license is active and no active bars to practice exist. Minor gaps in this dimension are common and may reflect licensing history nuances, but they do not suggest imminent risk of suspension or revocation. This score is strong.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score. It means the Verdica database—which draws from state bar disciplinary records—contains no formal disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions against Wade B Coye. A score of 850 in this category is the highest possible and indicates a clean record with no documented violations by the regulator. This is one of the strongest indicators available for assessing professional conduct.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three, though still in the acceptable-to-strong range. Practice profile metrics typically reflect credential diversity, specialization focus, reported case types, client engagement patterns, and other indicators drawn from public bar records and practice history. A score of 700 suggests the provider's practice profile may lack certain credentials, specializations, or documented practice diversity that would elevate the score higher. This does not indicate misconduct; rather, it reflects gaps in how the provider's practice is documented or structured relative to benchmarks. Readers should treat this as a signal to verify whether the provider's documented specialties align with their specific needs.
What regulators in CA track for legal providers
The California State Bar maintains comprehensive disciplinary records and practice history files that form the backbone of Verdica's scoring. State bar regulators track several key compliance dimensions:
Licensing and Bar Standing: Active status, good moral character findings, and any restrictions or conditions on practice.
Disciplinary History: Formal complaints, investigations, settlements, suspensions, disbarments, and lesser sanctions. The bar publishes these publicly and updates them regularly.
Practice Documentation: Reported practice areas, client types, transaction volumes, and credential claims. Providers may self-report or updates may come from case filings and bar records.
Consumer Complaints and Malpractice: While not always public, patterns of complaints or settlements can influence practice profile ratings.
Infractions that lower scores include ethical violations (client funds mishandling, conflicts of interest), competence lapses, failure to communicate, missed deadlines, and dishonesty. Scores move upward with clean disciplinary histories, active specialization credentials, and documented practice longevity.
Bottom line
Wade B Coye's 796 score reflects a compliant, low-risk legal provider with an unblemished disciplinary record. Before engaging, verify that the practice profile aligns with your specific legal needs, and review any available client references or past work samples to assess fit.