What Verdica's 796 score means for William J. Vasquez
William J. Vasquez holds a composite compliance score of 796 out of 850, placing him in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a low-risk profile based on state bar records. A score in this range indicates that regulators have found no material disciplinary issues and that licensing status is current and clean. For someone evaluating a legal provider, a score of 796 means the baseline compliance picture is favorable—there are no red flags in the public record that would warrant immediate concern. That said, the score is not perfect; a reader should understand that "strong" is distinct from "excellent" (800–850). The gap suggests there may be minor variations in practice profile or other factors that prevent a top-tier rating, though the score remains well above the threshold for acceptable practice.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 This sub-score reflects licensing status and regulatory standing with the DC bar. A score of 790 is very solid, indicating that Vasquez is in good standing with the bar and has met all active licensure requirements. Bar standing typically includes factors like current license status, payment of bar dues, completion of continuing legal education (CLE) requirements, and absence of license suspension or revocation. A high bar standing score means a provider is actively authorized to practice and maintains compliance with baseline regulatory obligations.
Disciplinary History: 850 This is a perfect score, indicating no disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions in the state bar record. Disciplinary history tracks formal complaints filed by clients, opposing counsel, or regulators, as well as any findings of misconduct. These can range from minor ethics violations to serious breaches involving client funds, dishonesty, or neglect. A score of 850 means the public disciplinary record is clean—a meaningful positive signal for anyone considering engaging this provider.
Practice Profile: 700 This sub-score is the lowest of the three, falling into the lower end of the "acceptable" to "strong" range. Practice profile typically reflects information about years in practice, areas of focus, client matters handled, and overall professional activity as reported to or tracked by the bar. A score of 700 suggests Vasquez has a functional practice profile on record, though there may be limitations in scope, visibility, or depth of documented practice history compared to more heavily established providers. This score does not indicate misconduct; rather, it reflects what the bar record shows about the breadth or documentation of practice activity.
What regulators in DC track for legal providers
The DC bar and similar state bar associations maintain disciplinary records that capture formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions. Infractions tracked include mishandling of client funds, failure to communicate with clients, dishonesty or fraud, conflicts of interest, and incompetence or neglect of a legal matter. State bars also monitor licensing—ensuring providers maintain active bar membership, pay required fees, and complete mandatory CLE hours. Practice history data includes information about admitted practice areas, years of licensure, and any public records of significant matters or professional activity. Scores move downward when disciplinary complaints result in findings of misconduct, when CLE compliance lapses, or when practice documentation is sparse. Scores remain strong when the disciplinary record is clean and the provider demonstrates continuous, compliant practice activity.
Bottom line
William J. Vasquez presents a strong compliance profile with no disciplinary history and solid bar standing. Anyone considering working with him should cross-check his practice experience directly (since the practice profile sub-score is notably lower) and confirm that his specific area of practice aligns with your needs. No customer reviews are yet indexed, so speaking with references or past clients would provide helpful additional perspective.