What Verdica's 796 score means for DANNY VICTOR MATISE
DANNY VICTOR MATISE holds a composite score of 796 out of 850, placing them in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects compliance and operational performance data drawn from state licensing records, federal complaint databases, and regulatory enforcement history. A score in this range indicates the provider meets core regulatory requirements and has not triggered significant enforcement actions or complaint patterns that would raise red flags.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, a 796 score suggests a low-risk profile suitable for standard commercial or transactional relationships. It is not a perfect score—the 54-point gap to the maximum reflects areas where minor compliance friction or complaint volume exists—but it does not place the provider on a watch list. Readers should interpret this as a qualified thumbs-up, conditional on their own due diligence around fit, service terms, and specific transaction details.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Compliance: 850 (maximum)
This perfect sub-score indicates DANNY VICTOR MATISE holds current, active licensing credentials in their jurisdiction and has no documented violations, lapsed credentials, or disciplinary records flagged by the state licensing commission. In real estate, this dimension captures whether a provider is legally authorized to operate and whether regulators have sanctioned them for rule breaches, misrepresentation, or operational failures. A maximal score here is the table stakes for trustworthiness.
Complaints: 800
This sub-score reflects complaint volume and resolution patterns reported to federal agencies (primarily CFPB and HUD). A score of 800 is strong but not perfect, suggesting either a low complaint ratio or that complaints filed have been resolved to regulatory satisfaction. It does not mean zero complaints—most active real estate providers field some customer grievances—but rather that the complaint density or severity does not indicate systemic misconduct or consumer harm.
Business Profile: 705
At 705, this is the weakest of the three sub-scores, though it remains in the "acceptable" range (670–739). Business Profile typically measures operational transparency, business registration status, financial stability indicators, and consistency of entity information across public records. A mid-range score here can reflect incomplete public disclosures, address inconsistencies, or limited verifiable operational history. It does not suggest fraud or deception, but rather gaps in publicly documented business detail that would benefit from clarification if you engage this provider.
What regulators track for real estate providers
State licensing commissions maintain records of active credentials, disciplinary history, and compliance with continuing education or renewal requirements. Violations tracked include unlicensed practice, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, mishandling of client funds, and violation of fair-lending or fair-housing rules.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) aggregates complaints related to mortgage services, loan origination, servicing, and property-related financial products. Common complaint categories include delays, fee disputes, documentation errors, and miscommunication about terms.
HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development) enforces fair-housing law, oversees FHA lending compliance, and investigates discrimination or steering. HUD enforcement records flag systemic patterns of lending discrimination, predatory practices, or violations of housing accessibility standards.
Verdica's composite model synthesizes these three data streams: a provider with perfect licensing but elevated complaints would score differently than one with minor licensing friction but strong complaint ratios. The weighting reflects that regulatory compliance is the floor, but real-world customer experience and enforcement outcomes matter.
Bottom line
DANNY VICTOR MATISE presents a strong compliance profile suitable for standard business engagement. Before proceeding, verify current licensing status independently, review the nature of any complaints indexed (if available), and confirm business contact details and registration match your own records. A 796 score is not a blanket endorsement, but it does clear the bar for low-risk consideration.