What Verdica's 796 score means for GEULAH MARIE STALLCUP
Geulah Marie Stallcup's composite score of 796 out of 850 places her in the "strong" performance band (740–799), indicating solid regulatory standing and operational compliance across the dimensions Verdica measures. A score at this level suggests a real estate provider with a clean licensing record, minimal complaint activity relative to peers, and a credible business profile as documented by state authorities and federal agencies.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, a 796 score signals lower regulatory risk compared to the industry baseline. It does not mean perfection—the score sits 54 points below the "excellent" threshold (800–850)—but it reflects a track record that regulators and oversight bodies have found acceptable to strong. The absence of indexed independent customer reviews means Verdica has not yet aggregated third-party feedback, so the score is built entirely on regulatory data, not consumer sentiment. Anyone considering engagement should treat this as a positive regulatory signal while recognizing the value of seeking their own references or direct customer feedback.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Compliance: 850/850
This perfect sub-score indicates that state licensing commission records show no active violations, lapses, or disciplinary actions against Stallcup's license. In the real estate industry, this dimension tracks whether a provider holds valid credentials, maintains required insurance or bonding, complies with state-specific continuing education mandates, and has avoided license suspension or revocation. A maximum score here is a green flag for regulatory standing.
Complaints: 800/850
This near-maximum score suggests minimal complaint activity in CFPB and HUD enforcement databases relative to the provider's tenure and transaction volume. The real estate sector uses complaint data to identify patterns of unfair or deceptive practices, misrepresentation, failure to disclose, or violations of lending or fair housing law. A score of 800 does not mean zero complaints—it means complaint history is low or resolved satisfactorily—but the 50-point gap from perfect suggests some documented issues exist in the regulatory record.
Business Profile: 705/850
This sub-score, the lowest of the three, reflects Verdica's assessment of business profile completeness and consistency as documented in state filings. In real estate, this dimension captures factors such as business registration status, operating entity alignment, history verification, and documentation quality. A 705 score places this provider above the "acceptable" threshold (670–739) but well below the "strong" band, indicating the business profile is established and legitimate but may have gaps in documentation, minor inconsistencies in registered information, or limited operating history relative to peers.
What regulators track for real estate providers
State licensing commissions maintain records of real estate professionals' credentials, disciplinary actions, and compliance with state-specific rules—including trust account handling, transaction documentation, and fair dealing standards. The CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) aggregates complaints related to mortgage lending, escrow practices, and transparency violations. HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development) enforces fair housing law and investigates discrimination complaints.
Scores move based on the presence or absence of documented violations in these systems: license lapses or denials, substantiated complaints about misrepresentation or failure to disclose, fair housing violations, trust account irregularities, or unresolved consumer disputes. A clean record across all three data sources—as reflected in Stallcup's high compliance and complaints sub-scores—indicates alignment with federal and state regulatory expectations. Lower business profile scores typically result from incomplete filing records, business entity name changes, or limited verifiable history with regulators.
Bottom line
Geulah Marie Stallcup presents as a strong, low-risk provider based on regulatory data, with particularly solid licensing compliance and minimal complaint history. Anyone considering working with her should verify her current license status directly with the state licensing commission and request references from recent clients, as Verdica's score does not yet incorporate independent customer feedback.