What Verdica's 850 score means for CAFFE ROMA
CAFFE ROMA has earned a composite Verdica score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the excellent band (800–850). This score reflects regulatory compliance data from FDA and local New York health department inspections and violations records. A perfect 850 indicates that across all measured compliance dimensions—inspection health, violation load, and enforcement history—the entity has demonstrated strong adherence to health and safety standards as documented by government inspectors.
Readers should interpret this score as evidence that regulatory oversight has not identified substantive compliance gaps at this establishment. This does not constitute a guarantee of quality or safety, nor does it replace independent due diligence. Rather, it signals that during the inspection cycles captured in the underlying data, CAFFE ROMA was not flagged for patterns of violations or enforcement actions. For business partners, investors, or consumers, this score suggests lower regulatory risk relative to establishments in lower bands.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection Health: 850 This sub-score reflects the overall condition and findings from health department inspections. A perfect score in this dimension indicates that inspectors did not identify systemic or critical deficiencies during routine or targeted visits. In the restaurant industry, inspection health covers food storage, temperature control, cross-contamination prevention, pest management, employee hygiene practices, and facility cleanliness. A high score in this area suggests that documented conditions met regulatory standards at the time of inspection.
Violation Load: 850 This sub-score measures the frequency and severity of health code violations on record. A perfect score means that either no violations were recorded, or any violations cited were minor and resolved appropriately. Violation load is important because it indicates whether an establishment has a pattern of compliance lapses. High violation load scores rule out repeat offenders or establishments with mounting citation history.
Enforcement History: 850 This sub-score tracks formal enforcement actions such as fines, closures, license suspensions, or corrective action orders. A perfect score indicates no documented enforcement actions in the regulatory record. In the restaurant space, enforcement history separates establishments with isolated findings from those subject to escalated regulatory intervention. A clean enforcement history suggests the entity has not triggered regulatory escalation.
What regulators in NY track for restaurants providers
New York's FDA and local health departments conduct inspections across several compliance domains. Inspectors evaluate time-temperature abuse of potentially hazardous foods, cross-contamination risks, and allergen management. They verify pest control compliance, proper handwashing facilities, and employee health practices. Licensing requirements—such as valid permits, certified food protection manager presence, and approved equipment—are also tracked.
Violations range from minor (e.g., labeling issues) to critical (e.g., pathogenic contamination, evidence of rodent activity). Repeated violations in the same category, or failure to correct violations within required timeframes, can trigger enforcement actions including fines, mandatory re-inspection, license restriction, or temporary closure.
Verdica's scoring model weights these inspection and violation data points to produce a composite risk profile. Establishments move down the score band (toward higher risk) when violations accumulate, enforcement actions occur, or inspection deficiencies recur.
Bottom line
CAFFE ROMA's perfect score places it among establishments with the lowest documented regulatory risk based on health department records. Anyone considering a business relationship should still verify current licensing status independently and, if relevant to the use case, review any non-indexed customer feedback or conduct independent audits. A compliance score reflects regulatory history, not operational completeness.