What Verdica's 813 score means for ACUFF ENTERPRISES INC
Verdica's composite score of 813 out of 850 places ACUFF ENTERPRISES INC in the "excellent" band (800–850), putting it in the top tier of measured trucking providers. This score reflects aggregated performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA): authority and insurance status, safety record, and inspection history.
For a business owner or shipper evaluating carriers, a score of 813 signals that ACUFF ENTERPRISES INC has demonstrated strong regulatory compliance across the board. The score is not a guarantee of perfect service or zero incidents, but rather a data-backed indicator that the company meets or exceeds federal baseline expectations in the areas regulators actively monitor. The gap between this score (813) and the maximum possible (850) is modest, suggesting room for improvement exists but no major red flags are present in the indexed data.
It's worth noting that Verdica currently has no independent customer reviews indexed for this entity, so the composite score reflects regulatory data only. Readers should treat this as one input in a broader due-diligence process—not a complete picture of operational quality or customer experience.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance (850/850): This perfect sub-score indicates that ACUFF ENTERPRISES INC holds valid operating authority and maintains required insurance coverage in good standing with federal regulators. In the trucking industry, lapses in authority or insurance are serious compliance violations; a score of 850 here means no such issues are flagged in FMCSA records.
Safety Record (845/850): This near-maximum score reflects the company's accident history, cargo-handling practices, and other safety-related metrics tracked by the FMCSA. A score in this range generally indicates a low frequency of preventable incidents or safety violations relative to industry peers. The 5-point gap from perfect suggests minor, non-critical findings, which is typical even for well-managed carriers.
Inspection History (710/850): This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, though still in the acceptable-to-strong range. Inspection history reflects the outcomes of roadside and facility inspections by FMCSA compliance officers. A score of 710 indicates that some violations or deficiencies were noted during inspections—such as vehicle maintenance issues, logbook errors, or driver qualification file problems—but not at a frequency or severity that would trigger regulatory intervention or warnings. This sub-score is the most common area where even compliant carriers show variability.
What regulators in TN track for trucking providers
The FMCSA operates a standardized system called BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) that assigns safety scores to every licensed carrier. These scores are built from roadside inspection citations, accident reports, and audit findings. Regulators monitor categories such as unsafe driving, fatigued driving, vehicle maintenance, cargo securement, driver fitness, and hours-of-service compliance.
For authority and insurance, regulators verify that a carrier holds the proper operating authority for its business model (interstate, intrastate, hazmat, etc.) and maintains liability and cargo insurance at federally mandated minimums. For safety records, they aggregate data on accidents, injuries, and preventable incidents. For inspection history, they track the volume and nature of violations found during compliance reviews—everything from brake defects to incomplete records.
A carrier's scores can move up if violations are corrected and inspection cycles pass without new findings, or down if new incidents, accidents, or violations are recorded. Regulatory data in this system is typically updated quarterly.
Bottom line
ACUFF ENTERPRISES INC scores in the excellent regulatory band with particularly strong authority, insurance, and safety metrics. Before engaging the carrier, cross-check current FMCSA safety data directly and—if available—request references from existing customers or verify insurance status independently. The inspection history sub-score suggests some past minor citations, which is normal, but worth understanding in context before committing to a partnership.