What Verdica's 809 score means for C P BUCKNER STEEL ERECTION INC
C P BUCKNER STEEL ERECTION INC has earned a composite score of 809 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong overall compliance with federal motor carrier safety standards as measured by FMCSA inspection data and BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) metrics.
A score in this range indicates that the carrier demonstrates reliable adherence to regulatory requirements across multiple safety and operational dimensions. For business owners or shippers evaluating this provider, the 809 score suggests lower regulatory risk compared to the broader trucking population. However, it is not a perfect score; the gap between 809 and the maximum 850 reflects some measurable variance in one or more compliance areas worth understanding before engagement.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance: 850
This perfect sub-score indicates full compliance with licensing and insurance requirements. The carrier holds current operating authority with the FMCSA and maintains the required liability and cargo coverage. In practical terms, this means the carrier is legally authorized to operate and financially protected against common claims—a baseline expectation, but one not all carriers meet consistently.
Safety Record: 835
This strong score reflects the carrier's performance history related to crashes, moving violations, and hazardous materials compliance. A score in the 830s typically indicates a low frequency of serious safety events or violations documented in FMCSA records. This dimension is particularly important because it tracks real-world outcomes—accidents, driver behavior on roadways, and compliance with cargo-specific regulations. The 835 suggests the carrier's operations and driver management practices are generally aligned with safety standards, though minor gaps exist.
Inspection History: 710
This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, falling into the "acceptable" range (670–739) rather than "strong" or "excellent." Inspection history reflects the results of roadside safety audits and terminal inspections conducted by FMCSA or state partners. Common infractions tracked include vehicle maintenance violations, driver qualifications, hours-of-service compliance, and record-keeping deficiencies. A score of 710 suggests the carrier has passed regulatory scrutiny more often than not, but inspectors have documented some violations or areas of concern. This sub-score warrants attention if frequent or recurring infractions are present in the underlying data.
What regulators in NC track for trucking providers
The FMCSA regulates all interstate motor carriers through two primary lenses: active safety inspections and BASIC scoring. During a roadside or terminal inspection, FMCSA or state officers document violations across categories including vehicle condition (brakes, tires, lights), driver documentation (medical certificates, licenses), hours-of-service compliance, and hazardous materials procedures. Each violation is assigned a severity level.
BASIC scores aggregate these violations over a rolling period into five categories: Unsafe Driving, Crash Indicator, Hours-of-Service Compliance, Vehicle Maintenance, and Cargo-Related Safety. A carrier's performance in each category determines whether it falls into "green" (acceptable), "yellow" (warning), or "red" (unacceptable) status. The Verdica composite score integrates this regulatory data alongside authority and insurance status to produce a single risk ranking.
In North Carolina specifically, carriers operating intrastate or through the state are subject to both state and federal inspection protocols. The FMCSA data feeds Verdica's scoring model regardless of where a carrier operates.
Bottom line
C P BUCKNER STEEL ERECTION INC presents as a strong, lower-risk provider based on its 809 composite score and excellent authority/insurance standing. Before committing to a long-term engagement, shippers should review the underlying inspection history details to understand which specific violations drove the 710 sub-score—this will clarify whether gaps are isolated, trending, or systemic. Requesting direct safety metrics or references from existing customers would also provide useful ground-truth data beyond the regulatory snapshot.