What Verdica's 811 score means for CHARDON CORPORATION
CHARDON CORPORATION's composite score of 811 out of 850 places it in the "excellent" band (800–850), indicating strong overall compliance with federal trucking regulations and safety standards. This score is the result of Verdica's analysis of regulatory data from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), which tracks safety inspections, licensing status, and violation history across the trucking industry.
A score in the excellent range suggests that CHARDON CORPORATION has demonstrated consistent adherence to federal safety and operational requirements. Readers should understand that this score reflects documented regulatory compliance as of the data pull date—it is not a prediction of future performance, nor does it account for factors outside FMCSA's oversight. The score is useful as one input when evaluating a provider's track record, but it should be considered alongside other due-diligence factors such as insurance verification, references, and service needs alignment.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance: 850
This sub-score reflects CHARDON CORPORATION's licensing status and insurance documentation on file with regulators. A perfect or near-perfect score in this dimension indicates that the carrier holds valid motor carrier authority, maintains required liability insurance, and has submitted or renewed all mandatory filings with the FMCSA. Gaps in insurance, lapses in authority, or incomplete documentation would lower this score materially.
Safety Record: 845
This sub-score is derived from FMCSA BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) scores, which measure violations across key safety domains: unsafe driving, hours-of-service compliance, vehicle maintenance, hazmat handling (if applicable), and controlled substances/alcohol. A high safety record score indicates few critical violations in these areas relative to inspection activity. In trucking, safety violations can range from minor paperwork issues to serious infractions affecting driver and public safety.
Inspection History: 700
This sub-score is the lowest of the three, though still in the acceptable range. It reflects the results and frequency of roadside safety inspections conducted by state and federal authorities. A score of 700 typically suggests that inspections have revealed some violations or deficiencies, but not at a level that would trigger escalated enforcement or out-of-service orders. This sub-score may be influenced by inspection frequency, inspection severity levels, or the number and nature of violations found during those inspections.
What regulators in NV track for trucking providers
The FMCSA conducts Level 1 through Level 5 inspections of commercial motor vehicles and carriers, ranging from comprehensive audits of operations and safety records to basic vehicle safety checks at roadside. Nevada, like all states, participates in FMCSA's safety audit program.
Key metrics tracked include: driver qualifications and hours-of-service violations; vehicle maintenance and defect remediation; hazardous materials compliance (if the carrier transports regulated goods); accident history; drug and alcohol testing and violations; and driver qualification files. The BASIC scores aggregate violations into percentile rankings; a lower percentile indicates fewer or less severe violations relative to the carrier's peer group.
Inspection outcomes can trigger compliance reviews, warning letters, out-of-service orders, or civil penalties if serious violations are found. Conversely, clean inspections and strong safety metrics can support a carrier's reputation and regulatory standing.
Bottom line
CHARDON CORPORATION's 811 score reflects a carrier in strong regulatory standing, with excellent authority and insurance credentials and a solid safety record. The inspection history sub-score suggests some past findings, but not at a level that signals systemic risk. A potential shipper or partner should verify current insurance, confirm the carrier's Nevada registration and operating authority independently, and—if available—gather operational references or customer feedback to round out the compliance picture.