What Verdica's 819 score means for COLVILLE INC
COLVILLE INC's composite score of 819 out of 850 places the carrier in the "excellent" band (800–850), which reflects strong overall compliance posture across the dimensions Verdica tracks. This score is built on regulatory data from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and indicates that the carrier has demonstrated consistent adherence to federal safety and operational standards.
A score in this range typically signals that a carrier has maintained up-to-date licensing and insurance, passed safety inspections at above-average rates, and kept inspection violations to a minimum. For a business owner or shipper evaluating trucking providers, an 819 score suggests COLVILLE INC is a low-risk partner from a regulatory compliance standpoint. However, the score is not perfect—the 31-point gap between this score and the maximum indicates there are areas where minor compliance gaps or inspection findings exist. The lack of independent customer reviews in Verdica's index means this assessment is purely regulatory; operational factors like on-time delivery, communication quality, or pricing are not reflected here.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance (850/850): This perfect sub-score indicates COLVILLE INC holds valid operating authority with the FMCSA and maintains all required insurance coverage at compliant levels. In the trucking industry, this dimension is non-negotiable—carriers without proper authority or insurance cannot legally operate, and lapses or violations here are typically disqualifying. A 850 rating means no deficiencies were noted in this category.
Safety Record (845/850): This sub-score reflects the carrier's track record of accident involvement, unsafe driving behavior, and driver-focused safety violations as reported to the FMCSA. A score of 845 is very strong and suggests COLVILLE INC has maintained a low incident rate relative to industry benchmarks. A single-point gap from perfect indicates minor findings, but nothing severe enough to trigger regulatory action or elevated risk flags.
Inspection History (735/850): This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, though still in the "strong" band. Inspection history measures the number and severity of violations found during roadside safety inspections conducted by FMCSA or state enforcement. A 735 score suggests the carrier has passed inspections overall, but inspectors have documented some violations—which could range from minor vehicle maintenance issues to regulatory compliance gaps. This 110-point gap between this sub-score and the safety record score is worth noting and suggests that while accidents and driver behavior are tightly controlled, routine compliance inspections have revealed room for improvement.
What regulators in AK track for trucking providers
FMCSA safety inspections in Alaska, like all U.S. jurisdictions, focus on vehicle maintenance (brake condition, lights, structural integrity), driver qualifications and licensing, hours-of-service compliance, hazardous materials handling (where applicable), and documentation accuracy. Violations are categorized by severity: critical violations (immediate safety risk), major violations (regulatory non-compliance), and minor violations (recordkeeping or administrative issues).
BASIC scores (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) are composite measures the FMCSA publishes based on inspection data. They cover unsafe driving, crash involvement, hours-of-service violations, vehicle maintenance, and hazmat compliance. A carrier's BASIC scores feed into its Safety Measurement System profile, which regulators and industry partners use to assess fitness. High BASIC scores or trends of increasing violations can trigger audits or enforcement action; low scores and compliance improvements are positive signals to shippers and insurers.
Bottom line
COLVILLE INC presents as a strong, compliant carrier with excellent authority and insurance standing and a solid safety record. The inspection history sub-score of 735 suggests minor compliance gaps that warrant follow-up—prospective partners should request a recent safety audit summary or ask about any outstanding corrective actions from recent inspections before committing to a long-term relationship.