What Verdica's 815 score means for EAGLE SYSTEMS INC
EAGLE SYSTEMS INC's composite score of 815 out of 850 places the company squarely in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong performance across the regulatory dimensions that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) tracks: active authority to operate, current insurance coverage, documented safety outcomes, and inspection compliance history.
A score in this range indicates that the carrier meets or exceeds baseline regulatory requirements and demonstrates a track record of safe operations relative to industry peers. For business owners or shippers evaluating carriers, an 815 score signals lower regulatory risk compared to the general trucking population. However, it is not a guarantee of service quality, on-time delivery, or customer satisfaction—those factors depend on operational execution, which independent customer reviews would help illuminate. Verdica notes that no independent customer reviews are indexed for this entity yet, so prospective partners should supplement this regulatory assessment with direct reference checks or past-customer outreach.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance: 850/850 This perfect sub-score means EAGLE SYSTEMS INC holds active USDOT authority and maintains current, adequate liability insurance as required by federal law. In the trucking industry, any lapse or deficiency in these areas results in immediate regulatory action or operating restrictions. A maximum score here reflects baseline compliance with no red flags.
Safety Record: 835/850 This score reflects the company's BASIC safety metrics—measures derived from inspection findings and crash data. A score of 835 is notably strong. In practical terms, it suggests the carrier's fleet has not accumulated unusual numbers of safety violations, accidents, or driver infractions in the FMCSA's tracking period. Lower scores in this category often indicate patterns of speeding citations, maintenance violations, or crash involvement; a score this high suggests the opposite.
Inspection History: 735/850 At 735, this is the company's lowest sub-score, though it remains in the "acceptable" range (670–739). This score is built from the frequency, severity, and types of violations found during roadside and facility inspections. A score of 735 suggests the company has experienced some documented compliance gaps during inspections—for example, vehicle maintenance defects, logbook discrepancies, or driver qualification file issues—but not at a level that triggers elevated regulatory action. This is the dimension most likely to improve or decline as new inspections occur.
What regulators in WA track for trucking providers
The FMCSA's safety inspection program focuses on two main audit types: compliance reviews (deeper dives into carrier practices and records) and roadside inspections (spot checks of individual vehicles and drivers). Inspectors look for violations in seven broad categories: unsafe driving, fatigued driving, driver fitness, controlled substance and alcohol use, vehicle maintenance, cargo securement, and hours-of-service compliance.
BASIC scores aggregate violations in these areas over a rolling period. A carrier's score improves when violations decrease; it declines when inspectors document infractions. The thresholds vary by violation severity. For example, a single critical violation (such as operating an unregistered vehicle) can move a score more than multiple minor infractions.
Washington State, as the host jurisdiction, also coordinates with the FMCSA on enforcement. Carriers operating in WA are subject to both federal FMCSA standards and any supplementary state regulations; Verdica's composite score reflects federal data, which is the most uniform baseline for cross-carrier comparison.
Bottom line
EAGLE SYSTEMS INC's score of 815 reflects a carrier with solid regulatory standing and a safety track record better than the median industry peer. Anyone considering this carrier should verify the score through Verdica's underlying FMCSA data, request direct references, and confirm current insurance status independently before contracting. The inspection history sub-score suggests room for improvement, so a pre-engagement safety audit may be prudent for high-value or sensitive freight.