What Verdica's 819 score means for F V MARTIN TRUCKING CO
F V MARTIN TRUCKING CO's composite score of 819 out of 850 places it in Verdica's excellent range (800–850). This score reflects a company that demonstrates strong compliance across multiple regulatory dimensions tracked by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA).
For a business owner or shipper evaluating this provider, an 819 score suggests low regulatory risk. The company has met or exceeded baseline safety and operational standards in the areas Verdica measures. It is not perfect—a score of 850 would indicate no compliance concerns across all tracked metrics—but the 31-point gap is narrow and typical of well-managed carriers. The 25 independent customer reviews averaging 4.2 out of 5 stars provide additional corroboration that operational performance aligns with regulatory standing.
Readers should interpret this score as a green signal for baseline due diligence, though it does not eliminate the need to verify insurance coverage, contract terms, or service-specific requirements before engaging the carrier.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance: 850 This perfect sub-score indicates F V MARTIN TRUCKING CO holds all required FMCSA operating authority and maintains current, adequate insurance coverage. In the trucking industry, lapses in authority or insufficient insurance are regulatory red flags that can halt operations or create liability exposure for shippers. A score of 850 here means no known deficiencies in these foundational compliance areas.
Safety Record: 845 This near-perfect score reflects the company's BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) scores, which measure crash involvement, moving violations, and unsafe driving patterns. An 845 indicates low rates of at-fault accidents and serious traffic violations across the company's fleet. This is a strong indicator of driver training quality and fleet management discipline.
Inspection History: 735 At 735, this is the company's lowest sub-score—though still in the acceptable-to-strong range. FMCSA safety inspections check vehicle condition, driver qualification files, hours-of-service compliance, and maintenance records. A 735 suggests the company has some documented violations or deficiencies uncovered during roadside or facility inspections, but nothing severe enough to trigger out-of-service status or major regulatory sanctions. This score is typical for mid-sized carriers; perfect scores (850) are rare.
What regulators in OR track for trucking providers
The FMCSA oversees motor carrier safety nationwide, including in Oregon, using two primary tools: safety inspections and BASIC scores.
Safety Inspections occur at roadside or at company facilities. Inspectors examine vehicle maintenance (brakes, tires, lights), driver qualifications (valid CDL, medical certification, training records), logbook compliance (hours-of-service regulations), and cargo securement. Violations range from minor (equipment defect) to critical (driver hours violations, brake system failure). Repeated or serious violations can result in out-of-service orders.
BASIC Scores aggregate data on crashes, moving violations, and unsafe driving practices reported to FMCSA by law enforcement and insurers. These scores are percentile-based and compare a carrier's safety performance to national or regional benchmarks. Higher BASIC scores (closer to 100) indicate worse performance; lower scores indicate better performance. Verdica inverts these for readability, so a high Verdica score reflects low BASIC percentiles.
Oregon does not have a separate state trucking regulator; FMCSA enforcement is primary. However, Oregon State Police conduct roadside safety inspections and report violations to FMCSA, contributing to a carrier's overall record.
Factors that move scores down include preventable crashes, HOS (hours-of-service) violations, maintenance defects, driver qualification issues, and repeat safety inspection violations.
Bottom line
F V MARTIN TRUCKING CO scores in the excellent range with particularly strong authority and safety records, offset slightly by a more typical inspection history. This profile suggests a capable, compliant carrier suitable for most freight needs, though prospective users should still verify insurance limits, request references, and confirm service area coverage align with specific requirements.