What Verdica's 813 score means for HEAVY HAULING COMPANY INC
HEAVY HAULING COMPANY INC scores 813 out of 850, placing it in the "excellent" band (800–850). This composite score represents strong overall compliance across the dimensions Verdica tracks: regulatory authority standing, insurance adequacy, safety record, and inspection history.
A score of 813 indicates that this provider meets or exceeds regulatory expectations in most areas and presents low compliance risk to potential customers. The score reflects data from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), the federal regulator responsible for trucking safety oversight. Readers should interpret this grade as evidence that HEAVY HAULING COMPANY INC has demonstrated reliable adherence to federal safety and operational standards. That said, no score is perfect—the sub-score breakdown below shows where the company performs strongest and where there is modest room for improvement.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance: 850/850 This perfect sub-score reflects full regulatory standing and proof of required liability and cargo insurance. In the trucking industry, maintaining active federal operating authority and adequate insurance is non-negotiable; it signals that the company is legally authorized to operate interstate and is financially capable of covering damage or injury claims. A score of 850 here is the baseline expectation for any legitimate carrier.
Safety Record: 845/850 This near-perfect score indicates a strong track record of safe operations. The FMCSA maintains data on crashes, injuries, and driver violations. A score of 845 suggests HEAVY HAULING COMPANY INC has few or no major safety incidents on file and operates vehicles and personnel in compliance with federal safety protocols. The one-point gap from maximum likely reflects minor or isolated incidents that do not represent systemic risk.
Inspection History: 710/850 This is the lowest sub-score, though still within acceptable range. Inspection history reflects the results of roadside safety inspections and compliance reviews conducted by FMCSA or state motor carrier enforcement officers. A score of 710 suggests the company has accumulated some citations or deficiencies during inspections—for example, equipment violations, logbook discrepancies, or driver qualification file issues. This is not uncommon in the trucking industry, where even well-managed fleets experience occasional inspection findings. The gap between this score and the safety record score suggests that most infractions are administrative or equipment-related rather than indicators of unsafe driving or crash risk.
What regulators in WA track for trucking providers
The FMCSA operates a federal safety monitoring system for all interstate motor carriers. Washington State trucking providers are subject to the same federal standards regardless of location. The FMCSA's Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASIC) scores measure carrier performance in five dimensions: unsafe driving, crash indicator, hours-of-service compliance, vehicle maintenance, and driver fitness.
Inspections can identify violations ranging from minor (equipment out of spec) to serious (falsified records, driver impairment). Repeated or severe violations can lead to enforcement action, including fines or operating authority suspension. The inspection history score reflects the frequency and severity of findings from these roadside checks and audits. A carrier with no violations would score 850; each documented deficiency lowers the score. Washington State also requires carriers to maintain proper registration and credentials with the State Department of Licensing.
Bottom line
HEAVY HAULING COMPANY INC presents a low-risk compliance profile with an 813 score. A business considering this provider should verify that the company's specific service offering and route align with its operating authority, and should request current proof of insurance before engagement. No independent customer reviews are yet indexed, so checking references or past shipper feedback would add another layer of due diligence.