What Verdica's 809 score means for J A DEVOS AND SONS INC
J A DEVOS AND SONS INC in Vermont has earned a composite score of 809 out of 850, placing it squarely in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This grade reflects strong regulatory standing across the dimensions Verdica measures: licensing and insurance compliance, safety record, and inspection history.
A score in the excellent band means the provider meets or exceeds federal baseline requirements and demonstrates consistent operational discipline. For a business owner or shipper evaluating this carrier, an 809 score indicates low regulatory risk relative to the broader trucking market. This provider is not flagged for systemic compliance failures, license suspensions, or major insurance lapses.
However, the score is not perfect. The 41-point gap between 809 and a maximum of 850 reflects room for improvement, primarily in the Inspection History sub-score (710), which trails the other two dimensions. This is a normal variance and does not signal distress, but it does suggest the provider's inspection record has some friction points worth noting. A reader should take this to mean: this is a trusted, well-managed provider, but one whose operational compliance is not flawless.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance (850). This perfect sub-score means J A DEVOS AND SONS INC holds current Motor Carrier Authority, maintains required liability and cargo coverage, and has no record of lapses in those credentials. In the trucking industry, this is the baseline table-stakes compliance metric. A carrier cannot legally operate without it, so a 850 here confirms the provider clears that gate without issue.
Safety Record (835). This sub-score reflects the carrier's history on safety-related metrics tracked by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration—typically crash rates, unsafe driving citations, and roadworthiness violations. An 835 indicates the provider's safety profile is substantially better than the federal average for carriers. This suggests the company invests in driver training, vehicle maintenance, and compliance culture. It is not perfect, which means some safety-related findings or incidents appear in their record, but the pattern is sound.
Inspection History (710). This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, though still in the acceptable range. Inspection History captures the results of roadside safety inspections and compliance reviews. A 710 indicates the provider has received inspection findings that pulled the score down—possibly for vehicle condition issues, logbook violations, or driver qualification shortfalls. These are correctable violations and do not suggest a broken operation, but they reflect instances where inspectors found room for improvement. Over time, this score can improve if the provider resolves cited issues and maintains clean subsequent inspections.
What regulators in VT track for trucking providers
The FMCSA publishes BASIC (Behavioral Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) scores and maintains a database of safety inspection results that Verdica indexes. Vermont regulators and the FMCSA look for several leading indicators of carrier quality:
- Crash involvement (frequency and severity)
- Unsafe driving (speeding, following too closely, improper lane changes)
- Vehicle maintenance (brake failures, tire defects, lighting issues)
- Driver fitness (medical certificate validity, licensing status)
- Hours of service (logbook compliance, rest period violations)
- Hazmat handling (if applicable)
Carriers are scored against peer benchmarks. Inspection findings are recorded and public. A high score like J A DEVOS AND SONS INC's suggests few or minor violations across these areas.
Bottom line
J A DEVOS AND SONS INC is a strong provider with an excellent regulatory score and no red flags in licensing or insurance. Before engaging them, confirm they hold current authority, ask about their safety policies, and—if you have specific operational needs (hazmat, specialized cargo, tight schedules)—request references and verify their claims authority covers your use case. No independent reviews are yet indexed, so direct customer feedback would be a valuable supplement to this regulatory baseline.