What Verdica's 815 score means for MIDLAND TRANSPORT LIMITED
Verdica's composite score of 815 out of 850 places MIDLAND TRANSPORT LIMITED in the "excellent" band (800–850), meaning the carrier demonstrates strong regulatory compliance across the dimensions Verdica tracks. This score is built on FMCSA safety inspection data and BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) scores, which are the primary federal metrics used to assess trucking provider safety and operational quality.
A score in this range indicates that the carrier has maintained good standing with federal safety standards, passed inspections at rates comparable to or better than industry norms, and does not carry flags for serious violations or operational risk. For a business owner or shipper evaluating this provider, an 815 score suggests lower regulatory risk relative to the industry baseline. However, the score is not perfect—there is room for improvement in at least one operational or safety area, as reflected in the sub-score variation detailed below.
No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so this assessment is based entirely on regulatory data rather than shipper experience. This is typical for many smaller or regional carriers and does not indicate poor performance; it simply means third-party feedback is not yet available through Verdica's index.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance (850 / 850): This perfect sub-score indicates that MIDLAND TRANSPORT LIMITED holds all required federal operating authority, maintains valid insurance certifications, and has no outstanding compliance gaps related to licensing or coverage. In the trucking industry, this dimension reflects whether a carrier is legally authorized to operate and whether it meets minimum insurance thresholds. A score of 850 means no red flags in these foundational requirements.
Safety Record (835 / 850): This strong score reflects the carrier's performance on FMCSA safety metrics, which typically include crash involvement, moving violations, and hazardous materials compliance (where applicable). A score of 835 suggests the carrier's safety history is above average but not flawless. Minor violations or isolated incidents may be present in the carrier's record, but they do not rise to the level of serious concern. This score is typical of providers with good operational discipline.
Inspection History (735 / 850): This is the lowest sub-score and represents the most significant area for caution. Inspection history reflects how often the carrier has been inspected, what violations were cited, and how quickly deficiencies were corrected. A score of 735 places this dimension in the "acceptable" band and suggests one or more of the following: the carrier has received a higher volume of inspections relative to peers, citied violations were noted but corrected, or maintenance or logistical issues were identified. This sub-score pulls the overall composite down from a near-perfect rating.
What regulators in NB track for trucking providers
The FMCSA oversees all commercial motor carriers in New Brunswick and the broader North American market. The agency conducts roadside inspections and reviews crash histories, maintenance records, and driver qualifications. BASIC scores aggregate these data into five categories: unsafe driving, crash indicator, hours-of-service compliance, vehicle maintenance, and controlled substance/alcohol violations. Scores in each category determine an overall safety rating.
A carrier's inspection history score is influenced by how frequently inspectors have flagged issues such as tire wear, brake condition, logbook violations, or driver medical certification lapses. Higher inspection frequency or citation history typically lowers this sub-score, while clean inspection records over time improve it. Regulators use this data to identify carriers that may pose elevated operational risk and to target enforcement efforts.
Bottom line
MIDLAND TRANSPORT LIMITED scores in the excellent regulatory range and poses low compliance risk based on federal safety data. However, the slightly lower inspection history sub-score suggests that potential users should request recent safety audit results or maintenance records directly from the carrier and cross-check any specific service requirements against their own risk tolerance.