What Verdica's 813 score means for PAUL D RILL
PAUL D RILL's composite score of 813 out of 850 places the carrier in the excellent band (800–850), indicating strong overall compliance standing across the dimensions Verdica measures. This score reflects performance on federal safety and operational standards tracked by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), the agency responsible for regulating trucking safety in the United States.
A score in this range signals that the carrier meets or exceeds baseline regulatory requirements and has maintained a safety posture that does not raise red flags in the areas Verdica evaluates. For a shipper, broker, or business considering engagement with PAUL D RILL, this score suggests lower regulatory and compliance risk compared to carriers in lower bands. However, it is important to note that Verdica's score is based on regulatory data only—no independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity—so the rating reflects compliance history, not subjective service quality or performance reports from past clients.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance (850/850): This perfect sub-score indicates that PAUL D RILL holds all required federal operating authority and maintains the insurance coverage mandated by the FMCSA. Carriers must hold a Motor Carrier (MC) number and active authority to legally operate; they must also carry minimum liability coverage. A score of 850 in this dimension means no gaps or lapses in these foundational credentials have been flagged in regulatory records.
Safety Record (845/850): This near-perfect score reflects PAUL D RILL's performance on FMCSA BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) metrics, which measure crash rates, unsafe driving, and fatigued driving violations. A high score here indicates low frequency of safety violations relative to industry benchmarks. Regulators use BASIC scores to identify carriers at elevated risk; a score of 845 suggests the carrier operates well within acceptable thresholds for unsafe incidents.
Inspection History (710/850): This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, though it remains in the acceptable-to-strong range. Inspection history reflects roadside and facility inspections conducted by FMCSA officers, who examine vehicle maintenance, driver qualifications, hours-of-service compliance, and other operational areas. A score of 710 indicates some inspection findings but not enough to trigger a warning or intervention level. Minor or resolved violations in maintenance, documentation, or procedural compliance may be reflected here.
What regulators in MD track for trucking providers
The FMCSA conducts Level 1 through 4 roadside inspections nationwide, examining vehicle condition, cargo securement, driver licensing and medical certification, logbook compliance, and hours-of-service adherence. Inspectors issue violations ranging from minor (e.g., light bulb defect) to critical (e.g., brake failure, falsified records). Carriers accumulate inspection records, and repeat patterns trigger scrutiny.
BASIC scores aggregate violations into five categories: unsafe driving, fatigued driving, driver fitness, controlled substances/alcohol, and vehicle maintenance. The FMCSA publishes these scores publicly and uses them to assign carriers to intervention levels—from standard (lower risk) to conditional or out-of-service (higher risk).
Maryland-specific requirements include state-issued permits for certain cargo types and compliance with state weight and dimension regulations. The underlying data Verdica uses comes from the FMCSA's Safety Management System, a centralized federal database; Maryland does not operate a separate state-level trucking compliance score.
Bottom line
PAUL D RILL qualifies as a strong compliance performer based on an 813 score, with perfect credentials and near-perfect safety metrics. Before committing to a carrier relationship, verify current insurance certificates, request references from other shippers, and confirm any specialized licensing if your freight requires it—regulatory data alone does not capture service responsiveness or operational consistency.