What Verdica's 815 score means for TAYLOR OIL CO INC
TAYLOR OIL CO INC's composite score of 815 out of 850 places the carrier in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a quantitative assessment of the company's regulatory standing based on federal motor carrier data, primarily FMCSA inspection and safety records. A score in this range indicates that the carrier has demonstrated strong compliance with Department of Transportation standards and has maintained a favorable safety profile relative to industry benchmarks.
For a business owner or freight buyer evaluating this carrier, an 815 score suggests low regulatory risk. The carrier is not flagged for systemic safety or operational violations that would trigger elevated oversight or enforcement actions. However, it is worth noting that no independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so Verdica's score reflects only regulatory compliance data, not service quality, responsiveness, or reliability feedback from actual shippers.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance (850/850): This perfect sub-score indicates that TAYLOR OIL CO INC holds valid operating authority and meets all federal insurance requirements. In practical terms, the carrier is licensed to operate and carries adequate liability and cargo coverage. This is a baseline requirement for legal operation; a perfect score here simply confirms the carrier clears this hurdle.
Safety Record (835/850): This sub-score reflects the company's performance on accident, violation, and roadside inspection outcomes tracked by FMCSA. A score of 835 is very strong, signaling that the carrier has maintained a low frequency of serious safety violations or at-fault incidents. Minor deviations from a perfect score typically reflect occasional infractions that do not indicate systemic safety management problems.
Inspection History (735/850): This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, though still within the "strong" range. This dimension tracks FMCSA roadside inspections, out-of-service notices, and critical defect findings. A score of 735 suggests the carrier has experienced some inspection citations—which is normal for active carriers—but they have not escalated into patterns of serious or repeat violations. The gap between this score and the others indicates room for marginal improvement in operational compliance.
What regulators in NJ track for trucking providers
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) oversees trucking compliance nationwide, including New Jersey carriers. The agency's core monitoring tools include:
BASIC Scores: FMCSA assigns carriers scores in five behavioral areas—Unsafe Driving, Crash Involvement, Hours-of-Service Compliance, Vehicle Maintenance, and Hazmat Compliance. These BASIC scores feed into the composite safety profile.
Roadside Inspections: FMCSA and state inspectors conduct Level 1–5 inspections, ranging from full vehicle and driver document reviews to spot checks. Out-of-service citations for vehicle defects, driver hours violations, or safety equipment failures directly impact the inspection history score.
Operating Authority: Carriers must hold active USDOT and MC numbers and maintain proof of insurance. Any lapse, denial, or revocation of authority will severely degrade the regulatory score.
Violation Severity: Not all violations are weighted equally. Critical defects (brake failure, structural damage) carry more weight than paperwork infractions. Repeat violations in the same category trigger heightened scrutiny.
NJ-specific oversight includes state commercial vehicle inspections and coordination with the NJ Motor Carrier Safety Program, which enforces state-level hours and logbook compliance.
Bottom line
TAYLOR OIL CO INC's 815 score reflects strong regulatory compliance and a solid safety record. For a shipper or business considering this carrier, the score is a positive indicator of low risk on federal compliance fronts. However, before committing to a partnership, cross-check independent references, service history, and response times with the carrier directly, since regulatory data alone does not capture operational performance or customer satisfaction.