What Verdica's 817 score means for WASATCH ELECTRIC LLC
Verdica's composite score of 817 out of 850 places WASATCH ELECTRIC LLC in the "excellent" band (800–850), the highest performance category. This score reflects a provider that demonstrates strong regulatory compliance across the dimensions Verdica measures: licensing and insurance, safety record, and inspection history.
For a business owner or fleet operator evaluating this provider, an 817 score signals lower regulatory risk compared to the broader trucking market. It does not mean the provider is perfect or incident-free—no motor carrier operates at zero violations. Rather, it indicates that WASATCH ELECTRIC LLC's compliance profile, as measured by federal safety data and inspection outcomes, is well above the midline.
The gap between the score (817) and the maximum (850) is modest, suggesting room for minor improvement but no systemic red flags. Readers should understand that this score is built on objective FMCSA data (the federal agency that oversees motor carrier safety) and does not reflect subjective opinion. However, the provider's independent customer review average of 3.7 out of 5 stars across 53 indexed reviews should be weighed alongside the compliance score—it represents a middle-of-the-road operational experience from a user perspective, distinct from regulatory standing.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance (850/850): This perfect sub-score indicates WASATCH ELECTRIC LLC holds all required operating authority and maintains valid insurance coverage as mandated by the Department of Transportation. In the trucking industry, failure in this dimension typically means an entity is either unlicensed, has a lapsed operating authority, or carries insufficient or no liability insurance. A maximum score here confirms the provider meets baseline federal prerequisites to operate legally.
Safety Record (845/850): This sub-score reflects the provider's historical performance on serious safety violations tracked by the FMCSA, such as out-of-service violations, hazardous materials infractions, or acute safety concerns. An 845 indicates very few (if any) major safety events in the regulatory record. A lower score in this category would signal patterns of speeding, maintenance failures, hours-of-service violations, or crashes. The near-maximum here suggests a disciplined operational culture.
Inspection History (725/850): This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, though still in the "acceptable" to "strong" range. Inspection history measures the frequency and severity of violations found during roadside inspections and audits conducted by FMCSA or state partners. Common violations include equipment defects, driver documentation issues, logbook discrepancies, or cargo securement problems. A 725 suggests WASATCH ELECTRIC LLC has encountered some inspection findings but not at a level that triggers heightened regulatory scrutiny. This score is a natural check on the higher Authority and Safety sub-scores—it points to incremental compliance gaps that merit attention.
What regulators in UT track for trucking providers
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) maintains the BASICS (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) scoring system, which measures five core safety dimensions: unsafe driving, fatigued driving, driver fitness, controlled substances and alcohol, and vehicle maintenance. Utah regulators and the FMCSA conduct roadside inspections and review carrier records to populate these metrics.
Verdica draws from FMCSA inspection data and BASIC scores to calculate its composite rating. Violations that worsen scores include speeding and aggressive driving, hours-of-service violations, medical certification lapses, drug or alcohol infractions, and equipment failures. Conversely, clean inspection records, current licensing, active safety training, and low crash rates improve scores. The scoring model is transparent and standardized across all carriers—no subjective judgment applies.
Bottom line
WASATCH ELECTRIC LLC presents a strong compliance profile with an 817 composite score, placing it in the lowest-risk regulatory tier. Any business considering this provider should cross-check the modest customer review average (3.7/5) against its strong safety score to form a balanced view, and verify that current insurance and operating authority remain active before engagement.