What Verdica's 816 score means for WICKKISER INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES INC
WICKKISER INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES INC's composite score of 816 out of 850 places it in the "excellent" band (800–850), indicating strong overall compliance performance across the dimensions Verdica tracks. This score reflects regulatory data from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), which oversees interstate and commercial trucking safety in Washington State and beyond.
A score in this range suggests the carrier has maintained solid licensing status, adequate insurance coverage, and a compliance posture that meets or exceeds baseline regulatory expectations. Readers should interpret this as a marker of lower regulatory risk relative to the broader trucking population. However, a high composite score does not constitute an endorsement or guarantee of service quality—it reflects historical compliance metrics only. The absence of indexed independent customer reviews means potential clients should supplement this score with direct reference checks and service agreements before committing to a business relationship.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance (850 / 850): This perfect sub-score indicates WICKKISER has current operating authority, valid licensing, and required insurance coverage in place. In the trucking industry, lapses in authority or inadequate insurance are red flags that can halt operations and signal financial or administrative distress. A maxed-out score here means the carrier passes basic gatekeeping requirements without exception.
Safety Record (845 / 850): This reflects the carrier's performance on FMCSA BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) scores, which measure crash rates, unsafe driving infractions, fatigued driving violations, and hazardous material handling. A score this high indicates a low rate of safety violations relative to industry benchmarks. This metric is backward-looking and based on reported crashes and roadside inspection findings over a rolling window; it does not predict future performance but does show historical restraint.
Inspection History (720 / 850): This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, though it remains in the "acceptable" band. Inspection history typically reflects the frequency and severity of findings from roadside safety audits by FMCSA or state motor carrier inspectors. Common infractions tracked include vehicle maintenance issues, driver qualification file problems, hours-of-service violations, and equipment defects. A score of 720 suggests some violations have been flagged during inspections, but none serious enough to trigger an "unsatisfactory" safety rating or corrective action plan from regulators. This sub-score warrants attention if you are risk-averse, but it does not indicate systemic non-compliance.
What regulators in WA track for trucking providers
The FMCSA maintains a public Safety and Fitness Electronic Records (SAFER) system that documents all interstate motor carrier inspections and violations. BASIC scores are computed from five categories: unsafe driving, fatigued driving, driver fitness, controlled substances/alcohol, and vehicle maintenance. Each category generates a percentile rank; carriers in the top percentile for violations trigger interventions such as audits or out-of-service orders.
State regulators in Washington coordinate with FMCSA but also conduct their own inspections. Common violation clusters include brake system defects, tire violations, lighting issues, logbook falsification, and driver qualification gaps. Verdica's Inspection History sub-score aggregates the frequency and severity of these findings. A carrier with zero inspections would score higher than one with routine minor citations; conversely, repeated major violations or critical safety defects would substantially lower this metric.
Bottom line
WICKKISER INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES INC scores well on regulatory compliance metrics and presents a lower-risk profile compared to most carriers in the industry. Before engaging, confirm current insurance limits, request references from established clients, and review any service-level agreements—the composite score reflects regulatory standing, not customer satisfaction or operational performance.