What Verdica's 809 score means for WINNER TRUCKING INC
WINNER TRUCKING INC's composite score of 809 out of 850 places it in the excellent band (800–850), which reflects strong overall compliance across the measurable dimensions that regulators and freight buyers use to assess trucking provider safety and operational quality.
A score in this range indicates that the provider has maintained good standing with federal safety authorities, has current and adequate insurance and operating authority documentation, and has not accumulated a pattern of significant violations or failures during inspections. For a business owner or shipper evaluating trucking providers, an 809 score suggests lower regulatory risk compared to industry peers—though it does not guarantee zero incidents or mean the provider is immune to future compliance issues.
The score is built from three sub-dimensions, each weighted differently by Verdica's methodology. The takeaway for someone considering WINNER TRUCKING INC: this is a provider that has cleared the compliance baseline and demonstrated sustained adherence to federal standards, but the inspection history sub-score (710) shows there is room for improvement in that specific area.
How the sub-scores break down
Authority & Insurance (850/850): This perfect sub-score means WINNER TRUCKING INC holds valid operating authority from the FMCSA and carries the required levels of liability and cargo insurance. In the trucking industry, failure to maintain these credentials is a disqualifier for legitimate commercial operations. A score of 850 indicates no current gaps or lapses in these foundational legal and financial requirements.
Safety Record (835/850): This reflects the provider's performance on FMCSA BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories) scores, which measure crash involvement, unsafe driving, hours-of-service violations, vehicle maintenance, and hazardous materials handling. A score of 835 is well above the threshold at which the FMCSA would open a safety investigation or issue warnings. It suggests the provider's drivers and fleet management have not triggered elevated rates of reportable safety events.
Inspection History (710/850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three, though it remains in the acceptable-to-strong range. It reflects the results of roadside and facility inspections conducted by FMCSA or state partners. An inspection score of 710 typically indicates the provider has received some violations or out-of-service findings during audits—such as maintenance defects, driver qualification file issues, or record-keeping gaps—but has not accumulated enough serious or repeated infractions to fall into a higher-risk category. This is a signal to monitor, though not a red flag.
What regulators in OH track for trucking providers
The FMCSA maintains a national database of safety inspections and compliance metrics that state enforcement officers in Ohio access and contribute to. Inspectors examine vehicle maintenance (brake condition, lighting, tire wear), driver qualifications (valid CDL, medical certification, training records), hours-of-service compliance (logbook accuracy, rest period adherence), and cargo securement.
BASIC scores aggregate violations into categories weighted by severity. Multiple or serious violations in any category can trigger a Safety Audit or Out-of-Service Order, which suspends operations until corrected. A provider's inspection history score reflects the cumulative weight of violations found, their recency, and whether corrective actions were completed. Minor violations (e.g., a single defective light) pull the score down less than major violations (e.g., brake system failure or falsified logbooks). Ohio-based providers are also subject to state-specific rules and periodic audits by the Ohio Public Utilities Commission for certain carrier types.
Bottom line
WINNER TRUCKING INC is a strong compliance performer with an excellent composite score and no apparent authority or insurance gaps. The inspection history sub-score of 710, while still respectable, suggests you should request a summary of recent findings before contracting and confirm corrective actions have been documented. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed, so direct reference checks remain advisable.