Excellent · Verdica composite score based on three weighted sub-scores from public regulator data.
9 active sources · last successful refresh Oct 14, 2026
source data currentHow this is calculated
Composite = License & Compliance × 40% + Complaints × 35% + Business Profile × 25%, scaled to 300–850.Read full methodology →
Each sub-score starts at a baseline and adjusts based on real regulatory-record signals. Zero-delta rows show what we checked and confirmed clean. “Data quality” indicates how much source data informed the score.
These are unmodified public reviews from Google Reviews — not Verdica ratings or paid endorsements. Reviews shown as-published, positive and negative alike.
Get instant alerts when this score changes. Track compliance trends, export reports, and monitor up to 200 entities.
14-day free trial · No credit card required to start
ARNOLD A ARMSTRONG scores 796 — these providers rank higher on Verdica's composite trust score.
The Verdica score is a composite trust score from 300 to 850, computed from state license records, consumer complaints, and HUD enforcement maintained by state licensing commissions, the CFPB, and HUD. A score of 796 places ARNOLD A ARMSTRONG in the strong (740–799) band. The score reflects publicly available regulator data — it is not a rating from Verdica itself and does not incorporate paid reviews or advertising.
Verdica combines three weighted sub-scores drawn from state licensing commissions, the CFPB, and HUD. Each sub-score reflects a different dimension of real estate compliance — license standing, disciplinary history, and complaint outcomes — and is normalized against industry peers before being aggregated to the 300–850 scale.
Verdica pulls public records from state licensing commissions, the CFPB, and HUD: state license records, consumer complaints, and HUD enforcement. Data is refreshed on rolling cycles, typically weekly to monthly depending on the source agency's own update schedule. See the "source data current" indicator on the entity page for the last successful refresh.
Believe this score is incorrect? File a dispute →
Is this your business? Claim this profile →
One of the Best to do it
View on Google ReviewsShowing 6 of 14 — indexed from public Google Reviews, not filtered by rating
See all 14 reviews on Google ReviewsCommon negative signals include license suspensions, unresolved complaints, or HUD enforcement actions. Any of these appear in the underlying regulator records and pull the sub-score down; the composite reflects the weighted impact.
Yes. Entities can file a dispute directly from the score page, and business owners can claim their profile. Verdica reviews disputes against the underlying regulator record; the score is updated when the source data is corrected. Scores are recomputed automatically as new regulator data arrives.
I had a very negative experience with this business. Payment was demanded in cash only, and the quoted price changed significantly within a short period of time (from $80 to $130 in less than two weeks). When I questioned the discrepancy, the response was unprofessional, and the conversation ended abruptly. This raises concerns about transparency and business practices. I strongly recommend exploring other options before bringing your business here.
I don’t see what these other people are saying about Mr. Armstrong? He helped me out with my DOT SAP violations multiple times but to each is own? This man is the #1 choice for me in this area but like I said to each is own.
Person is really know what his doing and really nice person as well. But what disappointment the most is not be able to follow through with part of obligation and the lack of communication. Me and my attorney being trying to get a hold of him for over a month a half about some paperwork and have left voicemails and email and no reply. After 2 month of the test being doing. Mr. Armstrong fail to send documents to my court and got me in a year probation due to no recived the assessment and i got scam $225.00. The man can answer his phone ihave went to his office 3 time left voicemail email. My lawyer have try to call him even my PO and he fail to get my assessment done. The guys is really know his stuff but really unprofessional and not responsible.
This man really knows what he’s doing. He’s got the right credentials for the job! I really am so grateful to have met Mr. Armstrong!
Extremely unhelpful over the phone. Would not recommend.