Excellent · Verdica composite score based on three weighted sub-scores from public regulator data.
11 active sources · last successful refresh Oct 14, 2026
source data currentHow this is calculated
Composite = Inspection Health × 40% + Violation Load × 35% + Enforcement History × 25%, scaled to 300–850.Read full methodology →
Each sub-score starts at a baseline and adjusts based on real regulatory-record signals. Zero-delta rows show what we checked and confirmed clean. “Data quality” indicates how much source data informed the score.
These are unmodified public reviews from Google Reviews — not Verdica ratings or paid endorsements. Reviews shown as-published, positive and negative alike.
Get instant alerts when this score changes. Track compliance trends, export reports, and monitor up to 200 entities.
14-day free trial · No credit card required to start
Parkers Farm Inc scores 764 — these providers rank higher on Verdica's composite trust score.
The Verdica score is a composite trust score from 300 to 850, computed from health inspections, violation histories, and enforcement actions maintained by FDA and local health departments. A score of 764 places Parkers Farm Inc in MN in the strong (740–799) band. The score reflects publicly available regulator data — it is not a rating from Verdica itself and does not incorporate paid reviews or advertising.
Verdica combines three weighted sub-scores drawn from FDA and local health departments. Each sub-score reflects a different dimension of restaurants compliance — recent inspection outcomes, critical violation counts, and closures — and is normalized against industry peers before being aggregated to the 300–850 scale.
Verdica pulls public records from FDA and local health departments: health inspections, violation histories, and enforcement actions. Data is refreshed on rolling cycles, typically weekly to monthly depending on the source agency's own update schedule. See the "source data current" indicator on the entity page for the last successful refresh.
Common negative signals include repeat critical violations, closures, or foodborne illness outbreaks. Any of these appear in the underlying regulator records and pull the sub-score down; the composite reflects the weighted impact.
Believe this score is incorrect? File a dispute →
Is this your business? Claim this profile →
Rating available but no written reviews indexed yet.
Showing 0 of 2 — indexed from public Google Reviews, not filtered by rating
See all 2 reviews on Google ReviewsYes. Entities can file a dispute directly from the score page, and business owners can claim their profile. Verdica reviews disputes against the underlying regulator record; the score is updated when the source data is corrected. Scores are recomputed automatically as new regulator data arrives.