What Verdica's 850 score means for WESTMINSTER ST AUGUSTINE
WESTMINSTER ST AUGUSTINE has earned a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the excellent band (800–850). This maximum score reflects performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection compliance, quality measures, and enforcement history.
A score in this band indicates that the provider has demonstrated strong adherence to federal healthcare standards, low deficiency rates during inspections, and a clean enforcement record. For someone evaluating this provider—whether as a potential referral partner, vendor, or consumer—an 850 score signals minimal regulatory risk based on publicly available compliance data. It does not guarantee perfect operations, but it reflects that regulators have not identified systemic issues or patterns of non-compliance that would lower the score.
It is worth noting that no independent customer reviews have yet been indexed for this entity on Verdica's platform, so the score is based solely on regulatory data sources. This means the assessment reflects CMS oversight, not consumer satisfaction or operational feedback from patients or business partners.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies: 850 This sub-score measures findings from state and federal inspections, typically conducted by state licensing agencies or CMS survey teams. Inspectors assess compliance with federal Conditions of Participation (CoPs) or state licensing rules. A score of 850 in this dimension indicates that WESTMINSTER ST AUGUSTINE either has had no significant deficiencies cited, or any deficiencies identified were minor and corrected promptly. High deficiency scores (or low raw counts) correlate with lower compliance risk.
Quality Measures: 850 CMS tracks clinical and operational quality metrics for most healthcare provider types. These may include readmission rates, infection rates, staff competency, care processes, and patient safety indicators, depending on the provider category. A perfect score of 850 here suggests performance at or near benchmark levels on the quality measures applicable to this entity type. This reflects clinical outcomes and care delivery standards, not just administrative compliance.
Enforcement History: 850 This sub-score reflects the provider's record of regulatory actions—such as citations, penalties, license restrictions, or corrective action plans—over a lookback period. A score of 850 indicates either no enforcement actions or a very clean history. Providers with ongoing disputes, financial penalties, or license suspensions would have lower scores in this dimension.
What regulators in FL track for healthcare providers
CMS and Florida's Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) oversee healthcare provider compliance through several mechanisms:
Inspection Programs: Surveyors conduct unannounced and announced inspections to verify compliance with Conditions of Participation, state licensure rules, and federal regulations. Deficiencies are documented by severity level (from minor to immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety).
Quality Measure Reporting: Providers submit or have data pulled on clinical outcomes, safety incidents, staffing ratios, infection rates, and service-specific metrics (e.g., wound care, medication management, emergency response times for certain provider types). These vary by provider category.
Enforcement Actions: Regulators may issue citations, monetary penalties, corrective action plans, emergency suspensions, or license revocation for serious violations. These actions are public record and tracked over time.
Licensing Requirements: Florida maintains active licensure for certain provider types; renewal requires ongoing compliance verification.
Scores move based on deficiency counts, quality metric performance relative to state and national benchmarks, and the presence or absence of enforcement actions.
Bottom line
WESTMINSTER ST AUGUSTINE presents minimal regulatory risk according to CMS data, with perfect marks across all three compliance dimensions. Anyone considering a business or care relationship should still conduct direct due diligence—such as verifying current licensure status, reviewing service agreements, and gathering operational references—but the regulatory baseline here is strong.