What Verdica's 796 score means for DANIEL ROY TUCKER
Verdica's composite score of 796 places DANIEL ROY TUCKER in the "excellent" band (800–850 range is excellent; 740–799 is strong). At 796, this entity sits at the high end of the strong category, just below the excellent threshold. This score reflects compliance and operational data drawn from state licensing records, federal complaint databases, and enforcement files. For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, a score in this range suggests a track record of regulatory adherence and low complaint activity relative to industry peers. The score does not indicate perfection—no provider scores 850—but it does signal that regulators and complaint mechanisms have found limited evidence of material violations or customer harm. Readers should interpret this as a green light for baseline trust, though due diligence specific to your transaction type remains important.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Compliance (850): This perfect sub-score indicates that state licensing commission records show no active license suspensions, revocations, or disciplinary actions on file for DANIEL ROY TUCKER. In real estate, licensing bodies track adherence to statutory requirements—proper bonding, continuing education, disclosure obligations, and transaction documentation. A score of 850 means the licensing authority has no record of violations or complaints that triggered formal action. This is the strongest possible signal from the regulator that granted the license.
Complaints (800): This sub-score aggregates complaint data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and HUD enforcement logs. A score of 800 suggests minimal or no substantiated complaints have been filed against this entity, or any complaints that were filed were resolved without enforcement action. In the real estate sector, common complaint categories include misrepresentation of terms, failure to disclose, unethical sales practices, or failure to deliver promised services. An 800 score does not mean zero complaints have ever been filed—it reflects that complaint volume and severity are low relative to peers.
Business Profile (705): This sub-score is notably lower than the other two and falls into the "acceptable" range. Business Profile typically reflects data about the entity's operational footprint: years in business, transaction volume, business registration status, and public-facing disclosures. A score of 705 suggests the provider has a legitimate, registered business presence but may have a shorter track record, smaller transaction volume, or less extensive public documentation than high-scoring peers. This is not a red flag—it often reflects a newer or smaller operation—but it does indicate less historical data for regulators and customers to review.
What regulators track for real estate providers
State licensing commissions maintain disciplinary records for real estate professionals, tracking violations such as failure to maintain trust accounts, misappropriation of client funds, unauthorized practice, false advertising, and breach of fiduciary duty. The CFPB collects complaints about financial service providers, including those involved in real estate transactions, and publishes complaint narratives and resolution outcomes. HUD enforcement actions focus on fair housing violations, discriminatory lending practices, and violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). Scores move up when licensing bodies issue no disciplinary action, when complaint ratios remain low, and when business registration data is current and complete. Scores move down when formal complaints are substantiated, when licensing action is taken, or when business profile information is sparse or outdated.
Bottom line
DANIEL ROY TUCKER's score of 796 indicates strong regulatory standing and low complaint activity, making this a reasonable choice for real estate transactions. Before proceeding, verify current licensing status directly with your state's licensing commission and ask for references from recent clients to cross-check the complaint data with real-world feedback.